May Newsletter from the Sex Offense Litigation and Policy Resource Center

Admin

The Sex Offense Litigation and Policy Resource Center distributes electronically, and free of charge, a monthly newsletter detailing new caselaw, scholarship, and other important developments in the field of sex offense litigation and policy.

May Newsletter

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

2 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This leglislative concept and these many views of past cases of this political pandering does present some merits to many cases and viewpoints but each case is different or are the commandments of any value today. I have even asked my PO about this and he just avoids the answer as do many. A probation officer does what the courts say to keep his or her job as my sister so says. Even Janice’s articlethe punishment does not fit the crime has merit.
Guilt or innocent is not a flip of a coin. If thats the case than we’re all guilty.

Their is an old saying, Nothing worse than a woman’ scorn. One wonders who turns the coin around? Actually I can see why more women have compassion than men in the criminal Justice field. This mixing Child Porn into much of this legal challenge is a bit of a ruse when those on the other end of a computer want to induce one with this stimulus. Much if this is just as much as the person or authority doing the pushing, harassing, or provoking. Letigation is good but moral judgment and true understand is better. Like many of you all have said on here their rewriting new law’s daily.

Sure going with past criminal cases and the outcomes does merit some values but every situations is different just like fingerprints. Sure its hard to adjust to environments and sure nobody wants to be in prison unjustly. We all have many pitfalls and roadblocks in life or who causes stumbling blocks on another. Is this pandermic a stumbling block for everyone or should we all go with the State vs the Pandermic if mankind even know’s where this pandermic comes from. We all seek answers. I have even met some good people in jails or do they still give traffic tickets to those that have fall out of the mouth in many respects.

0
Reply

The linked website is a great resource on court cases and scholarship relating to the registry and regitrants.
Check it out!

0
Reply