Oct 13, 2021
This report updates and expands upon the Commission’s 2012 Report to the Congress: Federal Child Pornography Offenses. It provides the Commission’s most in-depth study of child pornography production offenses to date through an analysis of three primary factors that the Commission has identified as relevant to sentencing child pornography production offenders. Focusing on data related to child pornography production offenders’ proximity to the victim, participation in production, and propensity to engage in other abusive behaviors, this report provides insight into how offenders exploit victims and technology to produce child pornography and the factors courts consider in fashioning sentences for these offenses.
Source: Federal Sentencing of Child Pornography: Production Offenses
See also: Federal Sentencing of Child Pornography:
Non-Production Offenses
Once again, the 80% myth is exposed. Once again, the sexual recidivism for non-production is stunningly low. Yet another helpful report to put under a judge’s nose. Other than inherent bias, I don’t see how any court can continue to support the States’ lies. Toss in the change in posture from the ALI, and it really starts to stink at the various capitols across the sinking ship Amerika.
Sentencing Law and Policy has a bullet point of key findings.
No senator would ever act on these reports. ALI has voted on what it should be. There is a growing library of studies, facts, meta analysis of evidence of what it should be. Tha being said, mob rules. Public perception is everything. If a senator introduces a bill that reduces sex offender sentencing, and those who vote for it, it career suicide. History shows us The public need a witch to burn, and until the next witch appears, sex offenders are it.
“Federal Judges Are Increasingly Rebelling Against ‘Overly Severe’ Penalties for Nonviolent Sex Offenders” “People convicted of possessing child pornography receive long sentences, but new data suggest they are rarely arrested for contact offenses after their release.”
This, from the Libertarian magazine of record, Reason Magazine and Jacob Sullum, their legal editor and stalwart defender of our, and others, rights.
None of this is news to any of us on this forum but it’s gratifying to see these draconian laws called out in a major publication such as Reason, even if I find that they tend to pull their punches just a little too much when the subject is “sex offenders,” but, hey, they do have to survive in this swamp, too.
Ask yourself how many Democratic or Republican publications would defend us. That’s why I’m a Libertarian.
Out of all the sex crimes that occur in America why are CP cases handed over to the FBI for federal sentencing, is it because of the severity of the crime, I dont know.
I do know, In order to get SB384 passed Scott Wiener had to sacrifice people involved in CP to the California DOJ.
Next year is almost here get ready because here they come.
Good luck