Utah Action Alert: Support Senate Bill 52 to lessen restrictions on sex offenders

Source: ksl.com 12/30/21

SALT LAKE CITY — A bill that could come up in the 2022 legislative session would change restrictions for sex offenders. The bill is sponsored by Utah state Sen. Mike Kennedy, R-Alpine.

The bill that could come up in next month’s legislative session would amend the state’s sex offender registry. Senate Bill 0052 would allow registered sex offenders to go to places like schools and parks, if they are with an adult. Also, if passed, the bill would replace the term “sex offender” with “registrant.”

Read the full article

Read the full text of SB 52

Utah residents, find your Utah senators so you can call and write them to support this bill

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

24 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Well I’ll be. What in the wide wide world of sports is going on here?

I am shocked and amazed – a bill relating to registrants that actually makes sense!
“Senate Bill 0052 would allow registered sex offenders to go to places like schools and parks, if they are with an adult. Also, if passed, the bill would replace the term “sex offender” with “registrant.””

It is a starting the right direction,more and more the tide is turning on this mass persecution of a minority group.

Was reading the bill on my phone which is difficult and I may have missed something. But…

A restricted area is a swimming pool or community park that is open to the public -> individuals required to register are not members of the public. Duh.

Two individuals required to register may enter restricted areas all day long. As long as one is at least 18 years old and they stick together the entire time. Yay.

Who comes up with this stuff.

As expected, most of the comments on this article vehemently oppose this bill. I’d bet most of them didn’t even read the bill before screaming that it endangers children and ignores victims.

Adults need to be accompanied by an another adult to be in a tax paid park. Did the state ask the adult if they could take money out of their account to fund a park they aren’t allowed? How condescending of Utah? At least they will be called a registrant which the hysterical public will believe minimizes crimes.

Happy new Year to the non-Karens/Kens!!!

This professor, Paul G. Cassell, is functionally no more than a lobbyist for victims groups and his ranting about this bill does nothing to actually help victims (registries don’t work, but he doesn’t think so) but the exposure will most certainly promote his career objectives by giving him free press.

How is Paul G. Cassell helping victims of sexual assault when the policies he supports can only possibly stop the 5% of sexual assaults committed by registrants? What about the other 95%?

Paul G. Cassell’s most idiotic statement? “Paul G. Cassell told KSL NewsRadio that right now, victims know sex offenders won’t be in certain protected areas.” If most offenders are not on a registry when they commit their crimes, what on earth is this man thinking? Where did he get his degree? Mr. Paul G. Cassell, I truly hope you read this. You desperately need an education.
This professor, Paul G. Cassell, is functionally no more than a lobbyist for victims groups and his ranting about this bill does nothing to actually help victims (registries don’t work, but he doesn’t think so) but the exposure will most certainly promote his career objectives by giving him free press.

How is Paul G. Cassell helping victims of sexual assault when the policies he supports can only possibly stop the 5% of sexual assaults committed by registrants? What about the other 95%?

Paul G. Cassell’s most idiotic statement? “Paul G. Cassell told KSL NewsRadio that right now, victims know sex offenders won’t be in certain protected areas.” If most offenders are not on a registry when they commit their crimes, what on earth is Paul G. Cassell thinking? Where did he get his degree? Mr. Paul G. Cassell, I truly hope you read this. You desperately need an education.

Last edited 2 years ago by webmaster

I guess the biggest question is where and what is the Utah aclu, or anyone that represents a state government watchdog in Utah doing????????????
There is certainly more than enough information to refute 99.9% of these uneducated peoples fear,
Apparently there’s only state Aclu s. Across the country?
Why isn’t there a national ACLU?
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!

A Republican proposed this bill? And a state university professor is the chief opposition? Is this Opposite Day?

I view the simple terminology change as an interesting development. Clearly, someone has seen the light, at least a little bit. Who woulda thunk it in arch-right UT?