CA: California Lawmakers Allow Lawsuits Against ‘Cyber Flashers’

Source: usnews.com 8/22/22

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — Victims who receive unsolicited sexually graphic material by text, email, app or other electronic means could sue the sender under a bill that California lawmakers sent to Gov. Gavin Newsom on Monday.

The bill targets what’s known as “cyber flashing,” where victims receive such unwelcome surprises often from strangers.

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

14 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

It’s amusing and infuriating to see lawmakers tackle “cyber flashing” when we have more pressing problems in California like drought, economic downturns, and employment issues…

Typical tactic of politicians to placate the masses with BS policies to create the illusion they are making things better when they haven’t.

Cool. Use this law to sue the FBI, the NCMEC, and/or whatever ICAC task force(s) are sending CP.

Last edited 2 years ago by Dustin

SMH and the internet still remains undefeated not just for people forced to register but for everyone in this nation that has been scared by it’s existence.
When I took my deal there was no smart phone’s and life was still Hell BUT once them smart phone’s came out my life took a dramatic turn.
This law is just a test run 10 years from now sending explicit pictures will be just like actually physically flashing someone, so be careful what your doing with those phone’s because law enforcement is just waiting to confiscate it

Is this an effort to wiggle around the 1st Am? Seems free speech may bar a criminal prosecution. Maybe that’s why the misdemeanor idea fell by the wayside.

Hot singles in my area is about to get sued…

Wow what a lame law… although u know how many lawsuits id have against users on Grindr for sending flash pics ? lol…. But maybe its a good thing then lawsuits could jam up the fake courts !!

Does that include twirking, also there are a lot of google pop up ads that i find offensive and demeaning towards both genders and i complain to google quite a bit about there ads that contain partial nudity some are very suggestive that only a urologist should need to explain and they tell you, you wont see this ad again! at least for another two minutes than they are back!

This law is a retirement supplement option for California Sex Offenders.

Desperate broads on dating sites very often send nudes as part of their new baby daddy entrapment process. You just need to be funny, clever and not ask and poof, she will eventually send you her tits or more…. then you can sue.

Get a few of these each year and you got a new Challenger and a mobile home in Adelanto!