Source: bettinaarndt.substack.com 2/26/25
What a story! Our media was agog at the recent NSW police announcement that they had exposed a $1.3 billion scheme for making fraudulent child sexual abuse claims. All the major media outlets excitedly reported on this huge “claim farming” scheme which recruited former young offenders, prison inmates and school students to file fake sex abuse compensation claims. At one prison, a third of the inmates had submitted claims.
The investigation revealed 4,000 faked claims, with the many law firms involved paying the claim farmers a benefit of about $2000 for each claim. One group of claims farmers apprehended in the police raid was found to have 100 applications ready to go – so they missed out on $30 million through the police intervention.
Big numbers, shocking scandal. And a mighty blow to the feminist narrative claiming false rape claims hardly ever happen. Here’s solid evidence that they are absolutely rampant, particularly when it comes to raking in money from our shockingly slack victims’ compensation schemes.
Either we presume that every single claim made against these public sector employees is true…
OR
Admit that Universal, Lifetime, Frightening and High Risk IS A LIE!
State presumes that the pictures they found on my computer proves that I am a F&H Risk of committing crimes there is no evidence that I have ever even attempted before. They further claim that this will remain true for life, with no possibility of change. They may even suggest that this F&H Risk of all new levels of criminal behavior make living near a public park too risky to be allowed.
Then they will insist that a State employee with one of more proven hands on victims, that were “Preyed upon” at a State School, or Youth Authority Detention Center, has just the few proven victims, and we should presume all other claims made against this person are false. Doesn’t matter how old the proven crimes are, doesn’t matter how many years this person spent with continued access to others, before the proven crimes came to light, we must presume there are no other victims!
Then… once that State employee gets out of prison, and becomes a PFR… they will insist this person is a F&H Risk of future crimes!
It would seem that F&H switches on and off based on the convenience of the State.