KS: Kansas lawmakers push for HB 2164 law restricting sex offenders from schools

Source: kshb.com 3/25/25

LIBERTY, Mo. — Schools in Kansas and Missouri differ in more ways than just the state line dividing them.

Kansas has never had a state law restricting certain sex offenders from being on school property.

In addition, Kansas doesn’t have residency restrictions.

Lawmakers in Kansas want that to change.

Senate Sub for HB 2164 passed the Kansas Senate by a vote of 37-3 on Thursday.

The bill was proposed by Kansas Sen. Kellie Warren after parents in the Blue Valley School District made complaints about a registered sex offender being allowed to attend an elementary school dance in a chaperone role.

If the bill becomes law, it would be a felony offense for registered adult sex offenders convicted of crimes against minors to enter school property or attend certain school activities.

Read the full article

Read the bill

[Kansas registrants and supporters, take action to fight this bill]

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

6 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

OK, about 30 years of SORA in Kansas without residence and presence restrictions. Surely, there must have been hundreds of sex crimes committed by registrants on minors during that stretch.

And I couldn’t help noticing the article saying that registrants had to get permission from the principal in these circumstances, meaning their problem could have been solved by simply complaining to the principal.

Since Kansas doesn’t have residency restrictions, it’d be interesting to do a study comparing homeless rates in Kansas & Missouri for people on the registry. I understand that Missouri is a much more urbanized state, but that might be remedied by comparing cities with similar urban challenges & demographics. Such as Kansas City Mo and Kansas City KS which are next door to each other. Or similar college towns like Lawrence KS and Columbia Mo. Or perhaps a study was already done, and Kansas is pointing to the study’s positive results as reason not to have residency ordinances. They have to be showing something to stave off politicians & Karens that want to change the law!

Toto, I have a feeling common sense isn’t in Kansas anymore. Did the guy assault, rape, or do anything to child? No just a bunch of pearl clutching and nothing more.

While the registry is a complete farce, I’m glad many of the laws proposed or enacted are limited to REGISTERED people. They could just as easily be worded as those simply convicted of an offense, which would eliminate any chance towards normalcy in one’s life. With more states leaning toward or adopting a tier style system, this at least gives many a path. I wish lawmakers would at least show enough interest to have a followup study done and publicly acknowledge the ultra low recidivism rate of sex offenses. They enact laws, but never follow up as to the affect of them on their constituents. Instead they count on LE to provide absurd arrest records from stings and random sweeps to point out their “Victories” against those looking to harm the youth of our communities (Last sentence paraphrased from a Nevada city councilman).

Another so-called solution looking for a problem.