CLEVELAND — Legal analysis: The United States Supreme Court has ruled against Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, regarding his review over citizens’ ballot initiatives.
Legally Speaking, this ruling effectively ends a two-year hold-up on a proposed change to the state constitution that would make it easier to sue police officers.
With 3 sentences, the highest court in the land protected Ohioans’ right to propose changes to our state constitution… by rejecting Yost’s request to put a pause on a lower court’s order.
…
For this proposed amendment, if passed by voters, it would strip police officers of “qualified immunity,” which is a powerful legal defense when they’re accused in civil court of violating citizens’ constitutional rights.
Wow would this be a move in the right direction!! Police wouldn’t be able to break the law anymore to get a conviction and get away with it. It could also pave the way to remove qualified immunity from prosecutors as well. May this move forward and qualified immunity be brought to an end. Amen!!!!!!!