Confining sexually violent persons in the mental health system

Source: mhanational.org (Mental Health America)

Summary
Sexual crimes are an unspeakable tragedy and among the most serious forms of violence imaginable. This is especially true when the victims are children. In response, at least twenty states and the Federal government have enacted “sexually violent persons” legislation.1 These laws provide for indefinite commitment of persons who have committed sex offenses after they have completed prison terms for these same crimes.2 We currently confine more than 6,300 people as sexually violent persons.3

Mental Health America supports using the criminal justice system to convict persons who have committed sex offenses and lengthy sentences when these are needed to protect the public. However, Mental Health America opposes using the mental health system to confine sex offenders because sex offenses are generally not the result of mental illnesses.4 These laws are not an effective or cost- effective way to reduce sex offenses and committing sex offenders to mental hospitals often threatens the safety of persons who do have treatable mental illnesses that require inpatient psychiatric care.  Addressing sex offenders within the mental health system is also a misallocation of resources that would be better spent on community and victim support, primary prevention and holding sex offenders accountable through the criminal justice system.5
 
Main message

The enactment of sexually violent persons laws has not reduced sexual violence.6 The rate of sex offenses is not lower in the twenty states that have enacted such laws than in the thirty that have not.7 Mental Health America believes that states should devote their resources to prevention and to the appropriate use of the criminal justice system to hold accountable those who have committed sex offenses. When lengthy confinement is a necessary and appropriate sanction for persons who have committed sex offenses, we should use the criminal justice system and its sentencing laws to impose such confinement, not the mental health system.
 
Supporting messages

We should reserve mental health commitment for people who have diagnosable and treatable mental illnesses. States enacted special laws for sexually violent persons rather than using existing commitment laws because the mental conditions that are the basis for sexual predator laws were not included in the definition of mental illnesses in existing commitment laws.8 Because the conditions which lead to commitment under sexually violent persons law are difficult to diagnose and treat, it is difficult to determine when someone has recovery and should be released. This either results in inappropriate releases, which endanger the community, or unnecessary and lengthy confinements, which are quite expensive and are unjust deprivations of liberty.

The implementation of sexually violent persons laws demonstrate that they use mental health commitments when punishment is the intent. Only convicted sex offenders are eligible for these commitments. Other people who may be as likely or more likely to commit sex offenses are not. Those committed are often confined in prison-like environments9 and expressly denied the rights afforded…

Read the full article and check out this supportive organization

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify or abbreviate their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments