UK: Police facial recognition cameras catch huge number of sex offenders in just few weeks

Source: mirror.co.uk 1/28/26

Facial recognition cameras have resulted in multiple sex offenders being arrested in just a few weeks, police have said.

Greater Manchester Police said it has used Live Facial Recognition (LFR) cameras 23 times since October – and in that time, one in five of all arrests made have involved registered sex offenders.

The cameras, which are positioned on top of special police vans, scan faces for unique biometric data (‘faceprints’) and instantly compare them to a watchlist of wanted offenders, alerting officers if a match is found.

As well as taking them on deployments in the city centre and at the airport, GMP put them outside Old Trafford for the Manchester United vs Manchester City derby earlier this month – the first time the force has ever used them at a football match.

LFR cameras have been supplied to police forces by the Home Office under a series of nationwide trials, with a recent Metropolitan Police pilot on a lamppost in Croydon resulting in an arrest every 34 minutes on average.

On Monday, Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood announced the vans would soon be made available to all forces in England and Wales as part of her ‘once-in-a-generation’ policing shake-up, with the total number of camera vans rising from…

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

If you are feeling extremely depressed and possibly even suicidal, please call or text 988 (suicide hotline) or any loved one who you believe is immediately available. If you feel depressed and in need of a friendly community and unbiased emotional support, you can email Alex and Marty at emotionalsupportgroup@all4consolaws.org

 

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify or abbreviate their name. 
  24. Please check for typos, spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors before submitting.  Comments that have many errors will not be approved. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

14 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

What were they arrested for? Simply for being identified in public?

with another man in the city square arrested on suspicion of possession of indecent images”

now how did the facial recognition program know that he had indecent images? This is going too far!

1 in 5 are PFRs, so what are the other 4? Shouldn’t the public know the full breakdown?

40 arrests and 30 charged which begs to know about the ten who weren’t charged. Were they mistaken ID by the camera?

The article is lacking details the public may want to know since it very pro-surveillance with the van cameras.

As we’ve all witnessed over the past couple of weeks, record EVERY interaction with cops when they do complance checks. I have doorcams AND hidden cams. It’s difficult for them to control the narrative when you have visual evidence that upends their claims.