Kat’s Blog: Death of a Registrant: Two Different Perspectives

The recent heart attack and subsequent death of a registrant who attended a “sex offender” treatment group for the past decade brought about two vastly different perspectives on his passing.

The group counselors were emotional and grief stricken. They expressed their concern about how to break the news to the group. They offered group time or individual time to help any registrant that needed to process feelings of sadness. The counselors emotions stemmed from the notion that this was “someone they had grown to know over the years” and that they could understand what the group must be feeling. They wanted to elicit a sympathetic reaction from the group.

And here is where the disconnect between counselors and registrants comes in.

The counselors couldn’t have been more off base in thinking they knew what the group was feeling.

The registrants attending this “sex offender” treatment group didn’t feel that they knew this person. They only knew his “situation” as they tend to call it. They knew his name, his offense and whatever other information he gave when forced to talk about his issues in group. That is hardly “knowing” someone.

“He seemed like a decent enough guy” was the general consensus of the group. But no one really knew him. How can any registrant know another registrant when fraternization “outside” of the treatment group setting is strictly prohibited.

“Sex offender” treatment groups are a bizarre little microcosm. Registrants are expected to spill their guts about the most stupid, serious, awful, horrific errors they’ve made in their lives to a group of total strangers. These strangers are then supposed to provide the registrant with emotional support on their journey towards rehabilitation. The irony is that you have contact with these people for an hour a week and that contact begins and ends at the door of the group meeting place. These aren’t your friends, you don’t socialize outside of the group, you don’t call or text each other, you don’t know their families and you’ve never been to their homes. These people are only hostages as you are, attending court mandated treatment. You certainly haven’t “grown to know them” over the years.

And death is viewed differently by many registrants who have served prison time.

Deaths of “cellies” either natural or by suicide or homicide is not unknown to them. Prison hardens a person. It has to. It’s the only way you survive. Everyday across this country cellmates die for a variety of reasons. Grieving that might be mistaken as a sign of weakness can’t happen. It’s just another day, another inmate when you’re in prison. Someone else leaving out the front door or back. This is what prison does to people. It changes them. And yet counselors still expect “normal” sympathetic reactions from former inmates once they’re out.

To the counselors, the group’s reaction or non-reaction to the death of “one of their own” may have seemed harsh, cold and uncaring. But this telling comment by the group accurately summed up what they were really feeling.

“At least he doesn’t have to come to this damn group anymore.”

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

15 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Watching someone with cancer, die, slowly while a judge refuses to release him from treatment until he was hospice hardens people as well.

It’s been made clear these aren’t “support groups”, they are for containment. Their model, literally, the containment model.

A real trauma or out-patient group is a safe place since everyone has confidentiality. That would be a huge help, but then the probation officer couldn’t direct treatment and have their probation questions on the “treatment” polygraph. Which, by the way, is now up to 4 questions for non sexual history polygraphs.

And I couldnt agree more, at least he doesnt have to go anymore.

“$EX offender” therapy is nonsense. Is there anyone with a brain who thinks that someone who commits a $EX crime needs therapy but someone who points a gun in someone’s face does not? The fact that there is “therapy” only for $EX is just another indicator of the vast stupidity of the witch hunt. Its stupidity is widespread and complete.

Not only that, but the “therapy” that I was involved in was nothing more than an extension of the probation/parole department and big government. I’m not going to engage with any people who work hand-in-hand with any big government probation/parole. I’m not going to deal with people who are only interested in “containing” me, “helping” society (and not worrying about or including me), and imprisoning me. So the “therapy” had to be worthless. But really, it was worse than just worthless. Made me want to harm people.

Speaking of which, prisons obviously do change people. And the Registries continue the change. But the Registries change the people listed, spouses, children, friends, employers, and many other people. The Registries have freed me from any obligations that I had to be a good, contributing citizen in Amerika. I don’t have to worry about that any longer. That obligation belongs to people who are not listed on a big government harassment list. Sad.

A couple of points:

1. Bill is absolutely correct. “Treatment” has nothing to do with rehabilitation or the betterment of the person. It’s strictly another means of supervision and effort to ensure the registrant spends his time running in and out of jail/prison.

2. More often than not, “treatment” is unnecessary because there is no mental illness to treat in the first place. People do stupid things and make foolish choices; that is not mental illness. It’s like forcing someone to a psychiatrist for choosing a pumpkin pie over a salad.

3. Even if the registrant in this story actually did require mental health treatment, he obviously wasn’t getting it from the group he was in if he was there for 10 years.

4. Georgia has an entire title covering the legal requirements that a court must go through to impose involuntary mental health treatment, a litany of requirements to continue it, and the rights of the person being treated. The court’s treatment requirement doesn’t comply with any of it. Betting it’s similar in California.

5. Presumably, the man’s been offense-free for the ten years he was in “treatment.” That should have been a pretty clear indication that “treatment” worked, if under the assumption that it was necessary to begin with. Betting the counselors would be pretty hard-pressed to therapeutically justify his remaining in their program for so long.

6. That the PO must bless program completion should raise several red flags to the APA regarding the conduct of the treatment providers basically lending their resumes and credentials to LE diagnoses and treatment plans.

7. Someone should address a court’s mandating polygraphs – either directly (mandatory probation term) or indirectly (only approving programs that require them) – knowing full well they’re inaccurate and subject to manipulation. And by address I mean in court.

Just my thoughts, for what they’re worth. My next project is to dispute treatment and polygraph requirements as applied to my case.

I disagree with will allen.

I am in group with a few guys. while a lower tier support group (worst is downloading CP no molestation and only underage sex was a 18 and 16 yr old..how he got busted..ugh). the counselor is great.

We not only talk about what got us arrested we talk about life in general and how we can improve our mental health. Also the legalities of what we can and can not do and what we must do.

I been in it 2.5 years. the last half year i have gone voluntary. I don’t need to go but i want to. being around others in my situation has helped me understand what and why. not to mention how to combat the feeling of wanting to continue in it.

I had tried to stop myself from doing it. I failed time and time again. Hell i even went and tried to find someone to help me but the counseling places told me they would have to call the cops and turn me in. To find someone that wanted to and knew how to help has helped me a ton.

Though i have heard of horror stories about some counselors. Where they did more harm then good. I think i was lucky on where i am.

Every time I read something like this, it makes me feel all the luckier having been part of the program that I was, and more respect for the man that runs it. My experience was very positive and helpful. Not helpful in regards to “curing” me, but helpful more generally with things I was dealing with in my life even before the arrest. It was also heartening seeing the program director constantly come to bat for everyone in the program every time the PO’s and even lawmakers would try to make things more difficult for us.

I’m sure that “counselor” feigned concern and manufactured empathy just to gauge a response from the group. They actually don’t care as that empty seat will be filled with a new subservient zombie.

Money over humanity.

Attended for a Decade?? What?

I’m in the interesting spot of having experienced both sides of this: a great therapist and an awful one.

My first therapist in VA was great: we had one-on-one sessions, which I paid for, but her group sessions we’re limited to four plus the therapist and they seemed to really be empathetic and involved too.

April pushed me to build a really strong foundation from my recovery (my issue is sexual compulsivity/sex addiction). And she went to bat for me too. In addition to really providing me the space and encouragement to understand how I had gotten to where I had gotten, she also was like “we’re going to focus on getting you to a place where you can use the internet healthily, so that we can petition the court to restore your access to the internet at home. It’s the 21st century, limited access to the internet is going to harm your ability to rebuild your life”.

Compare that to NY. No private sessions allowed, an average of 15 people a session. And compassion? A desire to understand my mental state and circumstances? Let me put it this way: when I shared how humiliating it was to get visited by the police every Halloween, my therapist responded, “you better be compliant, in NYC they’ll show up in body armor and shotguns” (no one ever showed up in NYC). I stopped being so forthright with my emotional struggles after that.

Oh, and he blamed black culture (“urban culture”) for being a bad influence on the minorities in our group when they shared their struggles, and he didn’t challenge the straight men who referred to women as “females”. Uuugh.

He did immense damage to my recovery that it took a lot of time to correct.