Janice’s Journal: Glimmers of Hope

There are glimmers of hope on the horizon for registrants and their families.  Most of that hope is based upon recent court decisions.  However, one piece of hope comes in the form of a recently published newspaper article.  Both will be discussed below.

One form of hope comes from a recently published newspaper article about a person charged with shooting and killing another person.  The headline of that article identified the suspect in that killing as a parolee.  It was only upon reading the full article that the suspect was also identified as a person required to register.

 I take hope from this article because I have read many articles in the past identifying the suspect in a case as a “sex offender” even when the crime in question did not involve a sex offense.  The most egregious example of that was an article about a person who burned trash in his backyard in violation of a city ordinance. 

The headline for that article identified the person who burned the trash as a “sex offender.”  What difference did it make that this person had previously been convicted of a sex offense?  If a person convicted of murder had burned trash in his back yard, would the headline have been written to read “murderer burns trash in back yard?”  Of course not.

The fact that the recent article did not identify the suspect in a shooting as a “sex offender” is a huge step in the right direction.  That is because the newspaper realized that use of the term “sex offender” was not appropriate.  Perhaps they also realized that use of the term “sex offender” would not help them sell more newspapers.

I also take hope from recent court decisions that have ruled in favor of registrants.  For example, in a series of cases involving petitions for removal from the California registry appellate courts have ruled unanimously that District Attorneys must prove that a registrant is likely to re-offend, not that the registrant must prove that he is unlikely to re-offend.  The shifting of this burden is significant as so far no District Attorney has been able to meet it.

Two additional court decisions that offer hope are decisions issued a few months ago by a federal district court in Missouri as well as the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals.  In those decisions, both courts upheld the First Amendment rights of registrants who were required to place themselves and their families at significant risk by placing a sign on their home on Halloween which identified them as persons required to register.

Are all challenges facing registrants and their families overcome?  The answer is no.  However, we now have momentum in the courts and in the media.  And it is this momentum that could eventually overcome those challenges.

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

11 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Your words give me hope, Janice. I remember what life was like before ACSOL got rid of presence restrictions, residency restrictions, Halloween restrictions, and many bad laws and bills. Thanks to you and the rest of ACSOL for making our lives better. We have a long way to go, but we have come a long way

My fellow registrants, I encourage you to do whatever your can to come to our lobby day. I will lose money from not doing my business then, but I consider it an investment in the future.

No people group has ever gained significant civil rights and justice by just staying home.

The term “sex offender” used to be so inflammatory, media and politicians used it incessantly to gain attention and revenue. It appears they over-saturated their marketplace while society’s primary concerns have shifted. Make no mistake. It still raises ire and fear, but I the worst is behind us. On a personal level, the mere mention of my presence on Twitter/X a few years ago would create a bandwagon of attacks. Today, similar posts by a select few obsessed individuals get a few likes but not much more. The big question: are we simply in a lull period between similar panics or is society finally starting to understand the difference between artificially generated mass hysteria and the combination of truth, logic and reason? Time will tell, but there is indeed reason to be hopeful.

Hope is a very important commodity. Unfortunately, it has been scarce one for many of us affected by the registry and the multitude of laws that have come from it. Thank you for sharing this hope with us Janice and let us hope and pray that the momentum continues.

Thank you, Janice, for bringing a ray of light into such a dystopian world. For some reason, Harrison Bergeron came to my mind.
John Q. Public remind me so much of Mr. and Mrs. Bergeron – blinded and manacled and weighted down.
Diana Moon Glampers? – I recall Janet Reno snatching Elian with the aid of a SWAT team, not too long ago. It seems like it started there and has just continued to do what slippery slopes do – apply gravity and deny any grip on anything.
Ho Hum

Thank-you so much for sharing this journal entry with all of us. You are such an amazing woman and I can’t say enough about how grateful I am for you. xoxo

Several years ago I, as President of WAR and our webmaster, Chuck implemented a ‘Moratorium’ against derogatory words and more importantly ‘person first’ language. Many journalists, editors, and professionals, as well as newsrooms have been educated and referred to Why call someone by what we don’t want them to be and Promoting Accurate and Respectful Language to Describe Individuals and Groups by Gwenda Willis and Elizabeth Letourneau.

When responding to calls on the support line the guy would always begin with “I’m a sex offender” and that is where I would rudely interrupt him and say we don’t use those words we use a person required to register. There would be silence and I would hear a shaky voice say ‘thank you’! I have even corrected legislators to their surprise.

Stand and stand tall!

Vicki Henry

I appreciate the “Glimmers” of hope, but sadly it’s not enough. There is no recourse for people who plaster posters of your picture and information all over town, even when you know who did it. The judge refuses to sign the restraining orders.

Thank you, bless you.