Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

1 Comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Is it possible that someone could prepare an Excel sheet (or Open Office spreadsheet) of the “score” for California cities which would be very informative of their current status on laws being challenged?

My idea would be to have a sheet of California cities that:

1. Have (or had) ordinances that restrict registrants in unconstitutional ways.
2. Show which of those cities were sent cease and desist letters by CA RSOL.
3. Show which of those cities have suspended enforcement of the odinances, but not rescinded completely, ostensibly waiting for action from the courts.
4. Show which of those cities have rescinded their laws without being challenged by CA RSOL.
5. Show which of those cities have been sued by CA RSOL and the corresponding court.
6. Show which of those cities have settled their cases with ensuing result, either suspension or recension of the ordinances.
7. Show which of those cities have lost the case, with ensuing results.

I didn’t include 8, which would actually be a decision that goes against CA RSOL, but I’m thinking of including it specifically to highlight the lack or complete absence of such cities.

In addition, all cities would have links to their city councils, as well as names and contact information.

I believe this type of sheet can be referenced by CA RSOL in their press releases, and that the press can get the overall view of the actions of CA RSOL and its campaign. This would have far greater impact, in my view, than the relatively anecdotal method of periodic reporting and news releases.

I can prepare the prototype. This sheet would not just have the above categories, but also the requisite timeline of events for each city, including dates ordinances were proposed for each city, the dates that they held their hearings, and the dates that they voted the law. Each step would be properly linked and sourced, either through online research or direct contact with city representatives. Would this be something that everyone could go on?

0
Reply