The Public Safety Committee approved by a vote of 4 to 2 Assembly Bill 702 (AB 702), which would create a tiered registry for sex offenders in California. The vote took place after testimony from three representatives of California RSOL as well as oral support from organizations including but not limited to the ACLU and California Attorneys for Criminal Justice. Additional support came from registrants and family members who attended the hearing. “The committee’s passage of AB 702 is a vital first step leading to the creation of a tiered registry bill,” stated Janice Bellucci, President of California RSOL.
During the hearing, Chairman Ammiano testified that passage of the law is necessary in order to increase public safety by allowing law enforcement to focus upon those who pose a current risk to society. Bellucci testified that passage of the bill will save state and local governments about $115 million a year. Two members of the committee –Skinner and Mitchell –spoke in support of the bill. Both female Assembly members stated that the current system is ineffective in part because there is no distinction between individuals on the registry. That is, individuals convicted of a minor offense such as public urination or “sexting” are required to register for a lifetime as are individuals convicted of a multiple sexual assaults.
The remaining steps needed to pass AB 702 are consideration by the Appropriations Committee and final consideration on the floor of the Assembly. The Appropriations Committee is expected to consider the bill in May. Final consideration on the bill is expected no later than September.
“This is the time for all registrants, family members and supporters to express their support for AB 702,” stated Frank Lindsay, Treasurer of California RSOL. “It’s time to call your elected officials, send them an E-mail and/or write them letters.”
Contact information for Assembly members can be found online at www.asm.ca.gov.
5-2..I’m taking all the positives as possible!
Janice, I’ve written my letters and emails to as many people as I can find – will you be able to bring to light the issue that as AB702 is now proposed, misdemeanor PC 647.6 offenses are being erroneously included in the tier 2 category? It would seem to me that the intent of the legislation would be to place the less serious offenses (misdemeanors) in the tier 1 category. I was convicted of a misdemeanor PC 647.6 offense for sending an “inappropriate” email to someone under the age of 18 (the remark in question was in reference to the attractiveness of the young lady’s bathing suit – her mother felt ‘uncomfortable’ with that as I was over the age of 18). I’m afraid that the offense description (Annoying or Molesting a Minor) is connoting to lawmakers the false impression that one convicted of a violation of this statute necessarily has committed a physical, lewd act with a child. This just isn’t so. I hope the Assemblymen/Legislature will be made aware that it would be unfair to place me in the tier 2 category for stupidly and absentmindedly typing a few questionable words on the computer to someone I had never met in my life: words that included no intent to seduce, no transmission of any obscene material, and no intent to entice or actually meet anyone in person. Nonetheless, the court determined that the remark I emailed to the young lady was “more than likely” sexually motivated. Guilty. End of story. Register as a sex offender for life. Please help. Thank you Janice.
Thanks, Janice. Also saw a Tiered Registry law being proposed in Missouri, of all places:
http://ozarksfirst.com/fulltext?nxd_id=785642
Janice, you are doing a wonderful job and may god bless you and all the others
fighting so hard to correct a wrong in this state.
This bill (AB702) is a mistake.
You cannot make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear.
A “Tiered Registry”, in practice will complicate the daylights out of a failed system.
Complication favors the prosecution because it obfuscates facts. Too much?
The more complicated it gets, the easier it becomes for the Prosecuting Agencies to F*%C-up your life….and that’s what they live to do.
We (is there a “We”?) need to take a stand, cemented in concrete, that the entire registry system should be abolished as it constitutes a Bill of Attainder; a pathway to multiple jeopardy; once again a descent into government-catered blood thirst and a miserable precedent to establish in a society dedicated to justice and freedom.
AB702 will make your life even more hellish.
Don’t support it, don’t tell Mrs. Bellucci, Esq. what a great thing this is because it’s not!
It’s a boldfaced terrorist agenda designed to further degrade the Constitution of these United States to the benefit of the Police State.
You do not understand that they hate you. They are allowed to hate you because the Government needs an enemy at home. You are it. Anything they do..*anything*..is to their advantage only. Nothing short of a full dismantling of the registry will devolve to your favor as a registrant.
Now wake-up.
Bill,
“The Art of war”
Sun Tzu said:
Avoid what is strong. Attack what is weak.
Sun Tzu’s teachings can be applied to any type of conflict.
Bill, I gave you a thumbs up. I don’t know if you’re right or wrong but I do appreciate your input; And, I’ve never been into being politically correct as there seems to be too much of that going around these days.
In addition to testifying before the Public Safety Committee, California RSOL actively lobbied in support of the tiered registry bill (AB 702) for two days. We met with staff and members to discuss the reasons to support the bill. During the meetings, we were told that the tide is shifting, that more elected officials understand that sex offender laws were passed in haste without regard to future unintended consequences. We were encouraged by what we heard and yet we know that there is much yet to be done. We will return to lobby in May the month in which the Appropriations Committee is expected to consider the bill. After that, the full Assembly will be asked to vote for the bill at a date not yet determined. THIS IS A CRITICAL TIME! Please contact your elected officials and let them know how important it is to support AB 702.
I think I now know why Bill G is on the registry. He needs counseling. Furthermore, I get the impression that even if and when this bill is passed, he will remain on the Registry. Sad to say.
RSOL CA… How dare you censor my last comment to ***
*** edited *** @Capt Jack – please refrain from name calling if you would like your contributions published. Feel free to use the feedback form to air any grievances you may have with this action. Thank you. Moderator
@ Janice B….. Why are you supporting this bill ? We want to ABOLISH the registry, once and for all !!! What is your thinking here? Have you been bought ? Please advise. Thx
Looks like censorship is alive and well on the rsol forum.
Just so the others know, it was USA I was pointing the finger at for making negative comments against another. He/she did it to me once before, and I let it ride, but this time I came down on him/her and was censored for my trouble.
If that’s the way it is here, I won’t be back!
RSOL, fighting for the constitutional rights of all citizens, as long as they agree with us.
I thought ABOLISHING the entire registry is our GOAL. Am I missing something here ? Please someone explain this to me 🙂 Are we dismanteling the registry a little bit at a time in the hopes that eventually it will not exist? Why do we put a stamp on changing an unconstitutional registry? Please explain/help. Thx 🙂
I haven’t seen anything on it yet, but does the new registered tier mention anything about the Megan’s Law website? I am a misdemeanor 647.6 lifetime RSO, but I was granted exclusion from the Megan’s law website of RSO’s. With this new bill, will that change? If I remember correctly, the last bill would have eliminated exclusions from Megan’s law and made it mandatory that everyone be included on the website.
Furthermore, Janice, is there any talk that misdemeanor sections such as mine will be dropped to a tier 1 status before this is passed or is it pretty set as it’s currently written?
Thank you for any input.
Regarding those worried about being placed into Tier 2: Isn’t there a petition process build into the bill whereby a Tier 2 registrant may petition to be moved down to Tier 1? If so, then there’s always that avenue, right?
EVERYONE needs to support this bill. It’s a HUGE step in the right direction. Rome wasn’t built in a day!
Dear Anthony, Anonymous Nobody, td777, and others with similar views,
Your situations suck. No doubt about that. Abolishing the registry would be great, wouldn’t it? It would be a dream-come-true. But this is the real world. And dreams don’t come true. Unfortunately, we are dealing with people who are very quite often, more interested in re-election than in righteousness. If we walk in there, if *I* walk in there, a registrant, and say: “Look, you people are insane and we want you to ABOLISH the registry”, then how do you think they are going to respond? It has taken 73 years to build this quandary of a system. Do you really think we can utterly annihilate it in a couple of sessions? This system is built on fear, misinformation, ignorance, sensationalism and even apathy. First is overcoming the fear by presenting reasonableness and coherency. Next is combating the misinformation by educating these folks with accurate information and eliminating their ignorance by providing logical arguments and real-world examples of just how impractical the registry is. The sensationalism is difficult to combat due to the media and pseudo-organizations such as Crime Victims United, constantly catastrophizing singular instances of deplorable crimes. However, some are beginning to recognize such stratagems. Apathy isn’t as hard to combat once you have a receptive audience – as long as they are willing to listen, then relating our personal experiences often provokes them to empathy. But we have to offer a reasonable compromise. With all due respect, you guys are forgetting that when we present such bills and lobby the representatives for support, we are entering a POLITICAL arena. Must I even elaborate on the games and agenda of politicians? Right now, the public is not yet educated enough. But public opinion is slowly starting to shift. Slowly. But even so.
Anonymous Nobody, I’m sorry you were convicted for crimes that you only *thought about*. Rest assured that cases like yours were discussed with some of the representatives. One Democratic member (an actual representative instead one from their staff) actually said something to the effect of ‘They’re becoming the thought-police. If people got arrested for all the bad things they thought about then we’d all be in prison!’ He said that in relation to a case similar to yours that we discussed.
Now, may I remind all of you yet again that my offense occurred as a juvenile. L&L w/ Minor Under 14, when I was only 13! Its absurd! And everyone we met with agreed. It is shocking to know that such a thing can happen. Yet even if this bill passes, I will be 40 years old before I’m off the registry. 40! How do you think that makes me feel? I was convicted when I was 20! I am being robbed of my best years. I will be middle-aged when I get off the registry if we make no further advancements after this bill passes. Yes, some will push back. But we will push back harder. I’m sorry to sound harsh when I say this, but seriously – if you want the registry abolished then get off your duff and get your rear up to the capitol! Go to the representatives’ offices and tell them that! Find another representative who is willing to write a bill like that. And for pity’s sake, pick up a copy of ‘Politics for Dummies’ while you’re at it.
Janice is working hard. She is working hard for you. YOU. She is working hard FOR YOU. She has no registrants in her family. Why does she need to do this? You all should be ashamed. Janice is an experienced attorney, what are you? Someone who sits around and reads bills and says “Poor, poor, poor ME! Poor, poor pitiful ME!” Get proactive. DO SOMETHING. You want big change? Do something about it. The law sucks. The legislation makes no sense. But for now, we have to fight fire with fire.
Did you ever go over the part about ‘finding a cause greater than yourself’ in SO Therapy? For 8 years I was just like you. But I decided that if ‘this lady’ is fighting for me and she doesn’t even know me, then maybe I ought to back her up a little bit. I’m moving waaaaaaay out of my comfort zone here. I’m a professional musician and had a public image to maintain, but that’s all over now. I have a business that is known both nationally and worldwide, as far as Japan, Australia, the UK, other parts of Europe. I’m no household name, but many people know me. I’m potentially throwing it all away to fight for the cause. But it also felt good to talk with some of the lawmakers and share my pain with them. For most of them, it hits too close to home. Especially to those with kids or family members who they are thinking about. Change will come. It will come. But frankly, Janice and the RSOL need more support. Get involved. Do something about it. What do you have to lose by writing some letters? By lobbying the capital or testifying at hearings? Put up a blog about how crappy your situation is from one day to the next. But don’t sit there and whine about how unhappy you are when these people are working tirelessly for you. Many people flew or drove into Sacramento at their own expense on Tuesday and Wednesday. Airlines, rental cars, parking garages, meal breaks…it adds up! Not to mention rising early in the morning, working until night. Answering phone calls, emails, holding meetings, going from one appointment to the next. Some people placed their customers on hold and are now dealing with angry people, jeopardizing their income because they blew everything off for 2 days. If the RSOL isn’t giving you what you want or need, then setup your own organization to handle it for you. Or go find one that does. But don’t sit in front of a computer screen and whine and complain to the ONLY PEOPLE YOU HAVE ON YOUR SIDE RIGHT NOW.
You want change? Make it happen. Find a cause greater than yourself and make it your passion. Or you can sit there and moan about ‘how bad your life sucks’, and in case you hadn’t already been told – WELCOME TO THE F***ING CLUB. Did you ever wonder if that’s how you ended up in this situation in the first place? Who and what were you thinking about when you ‘didn’t commit your offense’? Were you thinking about your family and your friends? Your potential victim? Were you thinking about the law? Or were you thinking about “ME”?
Join us in May on the steps of the capitol in Sacramento, go tell the legislators how you feel. Then after you get thrown out of their offices for such an asinine request, then you can sit here and dictate terms to Janice and the rest of us.
@mh……aka (Anthony)I was just asking for some clarification. Please be easy on people like me who just want justice like all of us here. Lead by showing some compassionin the words you use here. We always are asking for compassoon from our lawmakers regarding RSO”s- Lead by example here,as well. Nobody wins when you make condescending statements. I was somply asking a question, now I understand this bill a little better & also the approach. @mh…have some patience please. We are all in this together. Cheers !!! 🙂
The tiered registry bill, AB 702, was passed by the Public Safety Committee in the Assembly earlier this week. The next step toward passage is consideration by the Appropriations Committee on May 23 or 24. In order to increase the likelihood that the bill is passed by the Appropriations Committee, California RSOL will return to Sacramento on May 20 and 21 in order to lobby in support of AB 702, the tiered registry bill. Hope you can join us there!
In the meantime, please write letters, send E-mails and/or call members of the Appropriations Committee. A list of the 16 committee members, including contact information, is below. Attached is a sample letter as well as a point paper to get you started. Please personalize letters, but keep them short — one page maximum if possible. Thank you! Janice
Appropriations Committee Members
Mike Gatto (Chair)
Democrat – District 43
Contact Assembly Member Mike Gatto
Capitol Office
P.O. Box 942849, Room 2114, Sacramento, CA 94249-0043; (916) 319-2043
Diane L. Harkey (Vice Chair)
Republican – District 73
Contact Assembly Member Diane L. Harkey
Capitol Office
P.O. Box 942849, Room 6027, Sacramento, CA 94249-0073; (916) 319-2073
Franklin E. Bigelow
Rep – 05
Contact Assembly Member Franklin E. Bigelow
Capitol Office
P.O. Box 942849, Room 4116, Sacramento, CA 94249-0005; (916) 319-2005
Raul Bocanegra
Dem – 39
Contact Assembly Member Raul Bocanegra
Capitol Office
P.O. Box 942849, Room 4167, Sacramento, CA 94249-0039; (916) 319-2039
Steven Bradford
Dem – 62
Contact Assembly Member Steven Bradford
Capitol Office
P.O. Box 942849, Room 5136, Sacramento, CA 94249-0062; (916) 319-2062
Ian C. Calderon
Dem – 57
Contact Assembly Member Ian C. Calderon
Capitol Office
P.O. Box 942849, Room 5150, Sacramento, CA 94249-0057; (916) 319-2057
Nora Campos
Dem – 27
Contact Assembly Member Nora Campos
Capitol Office
P.O. Box 942849, Room 3013, Sacramento, CA 94249-0027; (916) 319-2027
Tim Donnelly
Rep – 33
Contact Assembly Member Tim Donnelly
Capitol Office
P.O. Box 942849, Room 2002, Sacramento, CA 94249-0033; (916) 319-2033
Susan Eggman
Dem – 13
Contact Assembly Member Susan Talamantes Eggman
Capitol Office
P.O. Box 942849, Room 2003, Sacramento, CA 94249-0013; (916) 319-2013
Jimmy Gomez
Dem – 51
Contact Assembly Member Jimmy Gomez
Capitol Office
P.O. Box 942849, Room 2176, Sacramento, CA 94249-0051; (916) 319-2051
Isadore Hall, III
Dem – 64
Contact Assembly Member Isadore Hall, III
Capitol Office
P.O. Box 942849, Room 3123, Sacramento, CA 94249-0064; (916) 319-2064
Chris R. Holden
Dem – 41
Contact Assembly Member Chris R. Holden
Capitol Office
P.O. Box 942849, Room 5119, Sacramento, CA 94249-0041; (916) 319-2041
Eric Linder
Rep – 60
Contact Assembly Member Eric Linder
Capitol Office
P.O. Box 942849, Room 2016, Sacramento, CA 94249-0060; (916) 319-2060
Richard Pan
Dem – 09
Contact Assembly Member Richard Pan
Capitol Office
P.O. Box 942849, Room 6005, Sacramento, CA 94249-0009; (916) 319-2009
Bill Quirk
Dem – 20
Contact Assembly Member Bill Quirk
Capitol Office
P.O. Box 942849, Room 2175, Sacramento, CA 94249-0020; (916) 319-2020
Donald P. Wagner
Rep – 68
Contact Assembly Member Donald P. Wagner
Capitol Office
P.O. Box 942849, Room 2158, Sacramento, CA 94249-0068; (916) 319-2068
Shirley N. Weber
Dem – 79
Contact Assembly Member Shirley N. Weber
Capitol Office
P.O. Box 942849, Room 5158, Sacramento, CA 94249-0079; (916) 319-2079
Here is a sample letter that can be sent to members of the Assembly Appropriations Committee. Please personalize it, but keep it to one page. Thank you!
(Your address and date here)
Dear Assembly Member:
The purpose of this letter is to request your support for Assembly Bill 702 (AB 702), which would reduce state and local spending by $115 million a year as well as increase public safety by eliminating individuals from the sex offender registry who no longer pose a public risk. This bill was passed by the Public Safety Committee on April 16 and is supported by many organizations, including the California Coalition Against Sexual Assault, ACLU, California Attorneys for Criminal Justice and California Reform Sex Offender Laws.
The current sex offender registry law in California is outdated and ineffective because it treats all persons convicted of a sex offense exactly the same. That is, individuals convicted of non-violent, non-contact offenses are treated the same as individuals convicted of violent offenses such as multiple sexual assaults. In addition, California is 1 of only 4 states in the country (along with Alabama, South Carolina and Florida) which requires lifetime registration for all sex offenders regardless of the nature of the offense or the offender’s risk of re-offending.
The current sex offender registry law is an ineffective method of combating sexual re-offending because it is too broad and it lasts a lifetime. In addition, it ignores the fact that sex offenders have a low rate of re-offense, only 1.9 percent rate while on parole, according to a California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation report issued in October 2012, and 5 percent after. Further, a tiered registry, similar to that proposed in AB 702, is recommended by the California Sex Offender Management Board.
California’s current budget challenges demand a fiscally responsible change to our social policy designed to prevent sexual assault. It has simply become illogical, irrational, and cost-prohibitive to expend our limited critical resources by treating all sex offenders the same.
By supporting AB 702, you will reduce state and local government spending as well as increase public safety. Thank you for your attention on this vital matter.
Sincerely,
(Your name here)
First I’d like to congratulate everyone that has worked so hard at getting AB702 in motion. It’s very exciting to see what can happen when a great leader and selfless volunteer like Janice Bellucci takes on a personal challenge to improve the lives of the many families that are suffering from the reckless laws that have been passed due to fear and undisputed rationale.
I don’t exactly know what tier I’ll end up on if this bill passes, I’m just happy to see progress. It’s given my spirits a boost from what they were a few years ago when I was released from prison and felt that my life was going to be one punishment handed down after another and then another. I’m on parole, wearing a GPS tracker, and have 10 pages of restrictions to abide; many of which are completely absurd and irrelevant to my initial charges. I’m standing on a narrow ledge. but it’s good to see the things that I have refuted to my Parole Officer from the beginning are coming to proof. The PO’s are just following their orders and I understand this. I just hoped I could make them question the ethics of their procedures. Jessica’s Law wasn’t on the brochure when I signed up for a Plea, Yet I’m stuck with it’s consequences.
I feel the frustrations that many feel with AB702 not being enough, but we must hang together and continue to reinforce this movement regardless of our personal agendas. “United we stand. Divided we fall.” It would be nice if they would clean the slate like they’re proposing for the 11 million illegal immigrants in this country. We could start with a new program where the tiers are determined at the time of sentencing based on all the facts of the case instead of relying on the Stat-99 or other hocus-pocus which is about as reliable as calling the Psychic Friends Network to determine a persons danger to society.
This is a link to the California Public Safety Committee: http://calchannel.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=7&clip_id=1133
I listend to what some people opposing of AB 702 and i find it quite funny. The same lady who i’m sure voted to make the SO management board in place are saying that it is ineffective. Why on earth would you keep something in place that isn’t working ? I wish i could sit down with these people and debate these matters.
I just watched the video. I felt sorry for the father of the offender. Did the blonde woman opposing the Bill even understand what she was talking about?
One of the key factors about the success of the bill is the fact that the bill is being promoted more as a “community safety” issue than as a “registrant activist” issue. I am a bit puzzled by the opposition’s assertion for a >40% recidivism rate for registrants, and that argument should be slammed out of the ballpark when it comes to approaching the representatives.
The “first test”…????……should have been if it was Constitutional
or not………….might save alot of finger pointing tier 3 are the bad
guys…..after all…pleading guilty is the difference between 1 and. 2
to 3 for majority………don’t forget the Constitution ….it works.