GA: Lawmaker apologizes for bill scrapping sex offender loitering statute

A freshman Republican state lawmaker apologized Monday for introducing legislation that would scrap a state ban on registered sex offenders loitering near schools, daycare centers and other places where children gather.

“In hindsight, this rookie mistake was silly,” Rep. Sam Moore of Cherokee County said in an extraordinary speech delivered on the House floor. “I am mature enough to admit that. At the time though, I believed that I was fulfilling a campaign promise to hit the ground running.”

Moore said he did not intend to enable child molesters with House Bill 1033. He said he was instead trying to protect Fifth Amendment rights by eliminating what he says are discriminatory and vague state laws against loitering. Article

Related:
GA: Bill would allow sex offenders at schools
GA: The case of the malicious sheriff

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

11 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Once again they bow to the hysteria of the discrimination that the states push upon us.

“How dare that freshman legislator show up and try to repeal laws that we hard working men of the people enacted to protect our defenseless children. That boy’s gonna get a harsh lesson in how we do things ’round here and how we like our laws: vague and unconstitutional!”

After watching the video I am not sure who I hate more, reporters, politicians,or politicians who roll over at the first hint of resistance from entrenched cronies.

How about a “No Loitering” law for ALL in ALL children dominated places. Under what circumstances would anyone without legitimate business (parent / visitor) be allowed to enter a school? There are rules against this already, it just is not a crime. I also do not see any reason adults need to hang out at the playground / park. To do what? Drink? Deal drugs? Worse?

Where this runs into trouble is the definition of ‘loitering’ (stop & frisk, anyone?) and the fact that this will negatively impact the embarrassingly (for a society that considers itself the beacon of civilization) large homeless population in this country.

A gutless coward that wants a political future rather than doing what is right. Not surprised at all, sort of like being intimidated into a confession by police and crooked DA’s. Spineless little freshman wimp, he’d roll over for a fast buck, stinking jellyfish!

It sounds like his campaign promise was to uphold The Constitution and Its Amendments. They wasted no time in neutering this youngster and quelling this rebellious inclination.

If stupidity were a college subject, most politicians would have been on the Dean’s List

Why would this idiot think that constitutional protections apply to Americans?

Now back to our regularly scheduled program, “The Shredding of the Constitution”.

I can’t fault this man for his actions or comments. He got a taste of what we go through everyday. Am I a coward for taking a deal to avoid prison? Pushing this would have probably been career suicide for him and he took the easy way out.

He got a taste of the constitution but the cronies got to him, made him spit it out, washed his mouth out with soap, and told him he would never be elected to another public office if he didn’t withdraw his statement.

That’s probably how it went down.

He swore to uphold the Constitution, as he understands it, but chose to follow the herd when it became a choice between the two. He is not now a leader, but what politician is. They serve the media and money. No Lincoln or Teddy Roosevelt here.