IL: Sex Offenders May Be Banned From Illinois County Fairs

A bill under consideration would ban registered sex offenders from going to county fairs.

“There is a loophole in the current sex offender law that says you can’t work at the county fairs or you can’t be a vendor at the county fairs, but you can attend them,” Illinois State Representative Mike Smiddy told News 8′s Angie Sharp on Wednesday, February 12th, 2014.

State Rep. Smiddy heard about the loophole following the 2013 Whiteside County Fair. The State’s Attorney for Whiteside County called him and explained an instance where a Whiteside County Sheriff’s Deputy noticed a convicted sex offender around children at the fair. However, he wasn’t able to do anything, because it’s not against the law. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of
We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

13 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Was he taking his kids there to enjoy what life has to offer?

Unless he was banned as part of supervised release, it should be of absolutely no consequence other than that person that noticed him there to stay away from him and
not harass him or interfere with the registrant’s rights.

Police and public officials need to underscore the purpose of the law is not to further admonish registrants but to have the general population make informed decisions such as avoiding this person if they choose. Our pastor tried to get this point across in sermons in general terms. He is not the pastor anymore. Apparently cafeteria christianity is in vogue…

The dumb public employee really is saying the free citizen did NOTHING to assault another person…….thanks for reporting info that defends fundamental rights …buford.

This article and virtually all others never inform the public that the term SO as it applies in most cases regarding sanctions, is applied to persons on supervised release. It lumps in everyone regardless of how many decades their cases have been closed. Never once does the media step up to clear that up – that probably 10% of the registrants (or less) are actually on parole or probation and subject to most of the ‘permission’ presences.

The media is just as much to blame as the idiot politicians that put these draconian laws – based on invalid assumptions – in place.

Maybe they should ban kid’s from the fair, that way it would protect them all from RSO’s that attend. It would be simpler that way you can tell who is a kid or not,just by looking at them. But you can’t tell a RSO just by looking at them

There is a loophole in the current sex offender law that says you can’t work at the county fairs or you can’t be a vendor at the county fairs, but you can attend them,”

I find this statement hilarious and perplexing considering Megan’s Law IS a gigantic LOOPHOLE in the U.S Constitution that circumvents the privacy, safety and security of an individual for fleeting psychological comfort in knowing where one of “those people” lives.