General won’t plead guilty if it means sex-offender registry, defense says

(CNN) — The defense and prosecution were hammering out a plea deal Tuesday in the court-martial of Brig. Gen. Jeffrey Sinclair, but no matter what the negotiations hold, the defense says three things are off the table.

First, Sinclair won’t plead guilty to sexual assault, said Josh Zeitz, a spokesman for the general’s defense team. Nor will he plead guilty to any charge that will land him on a sex-offender registry. And lastly, Zeitz said, Sinclair will not plead guilty to threatening his accuser or her family. Full Article

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

General won’t plead guilty if it means sex-offender registry, defense says:

… in 3, 2, 1… but it isn’t punishment! Said if first – Huzzah!

And clearly the good General is not in favor of protecting children…

If this guy is guilty he needs to be nailed to a cross like the rest of us; web site, yearly registration, subject to plethora of lame laws, the whole nine yards. Double standards are BS!!!!

Someone as influential as a General, willing to risk harsh punishment in lieu of registration, might sway some judges and legislators in the way they perceive the process.

Hence the point of equal protection and far outta bounds of ex post facto as we are on a registry today he can clearly see is lifetime punishment ….we all would in similarly situated of plea bargain would negotiate so as to be off registry……….they need to have everyone listed today to be off registry and start over upon new crime …..this case clearly sees punishment …its against the foundation of law.

Being experienced in being courtmartialed .. Welcome General to the path you sent many on…
Now some interesting facts… a military judge almost nevers orders registration on anyone, that is up to the states when they get their hands on the record of trial and process those crimes in comparison to what they have..
Also there is no certificate of rehabilitation.. only one that can forgive is the president… which is never..

Also you are guilty until proven innocent under the UCMJ. For them to get to the point of a trial, there is already overwhelming evidence stacked against the General… If there was little to no solid evidence the chain of command would of shut this down and sweep it under the rug…
There will be no sway in legislation on the General’s reaction to a registration.. because the Government always sees military courtmartials has the perfect system.. 98% conviction rate..


If the request to keep from being registered is accepted by the judge, CA RSOL should be ALL OVER THIS in all future court proceedings involving any sex offender issue as PROOF that the registry schema is punitive, not regulatory, and in fact could probably be challenged on that facet alone.

I should like to point out that anyone of lower rank convicted of a sex offense would lose his pension. Part of the general’s plea bargain was a “reduced pension.” And now he is refusing to plead if he must register. It must be nice to have the power to negotiate your own punishment.

Oh Boy,,,Um This is gonna be interesting how it turns out. I knew eventually this would happen a box within a box,,,? It’s starting to unravel & unsettle allot of people…& Brubaker said it… If Your accused You Will be Convicted one way or another in Cali. Now You can do it the Hard way or the really hard way! But to ask for no registry req’s & Get it? Yea That is a blatant outrage & HA,HA! in the face of the voters that voted for these laws. not to mention All those suffering due to them.