Do Residency Bans Drive Sex Offenders Underground?

Early last year, Los Angeles set aside a sliver of land in its Harbor Gateway neighborhood for the city’s newest and smallest park: two jungle gyms on a fifth of an acre.

The project was more than just an effort to increase the city’s green space. City Council members made clear that one of the park’s principal reasons for existence was to force 33 people on the California sex offender registry who were living in a nearby apartment building to move out. State law bars those on its registry from living within 2,000 feet of a park or school.

“We came together, working with the police department, to problem-solve, to send a message that Harbor Gateway cannot be dumped upon with a high number of registered sex offenders,” councilman Joe Buscaino said at the park’s opening. Full Article

Also see:
NPR: Harbor Gateway’s pocket park solution to sex offenders
New Harbor Gateway Pocket Park to Break up Concentration of Sex Offenders

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Hey, if they openly admitted to the real reason of installing the park was to “rid” themselves of having “sex offenders” living nearby, then i’m sure this is a valid statement that can be used in court in some case that makes that points about how punitive the laws are to the registered citizens.

I left a major national organization just recently to start my own, Organizations Addressing Unfounded Fear, who’s aim is also to collect information like this that might help people out in court.

If people simply understood their history, they would know that a life sentence on select group of people tends to drive them underground. Look at the Christian church in communist countries, Jews during Hitler’s reign, and every other time a group has been targeted for persecution. They tend to go into hiding, so no one should be surprised that this group does the same thing.

Well…planting evidence takes on a new look in that scenario ……..planting evidence …its just not for a jury instruction but on a lot too.

Very few of us need to be tracked. I stuck my hand in the fire and don’t think it is going to feel any better doing it again. What the tracking and the residency restrictions do is create social outcasts not better citizens. Social stigmatization is very painful, no one wishes to admit it, and the outcasts seek out each other for community. Duh, humans do this banding together with others who they feel are not going to hate them type of thing. It’s in our nature. As td777 says above this is an historical (and present) fact.

Registry restrictions are illogical.

If they want to know where a RSO offender is then they need to allow use to live wherever we like…that way they know exactly where are (just as they planned). If they restrict where we can live they are simply trying to ZONE us out of their area…PERIOD!

Illegal and unconstitutional on so many levels!