California passes ‘yes-means-yes’ campus sexual assault bill

Admin

Californian lawmakers passed a law on Thursday requiring universities to adopt “affirmative consent” language in their definitions of consensual sex, part of a nationwide drive to curb sexual assault on U.S. campuses. Full Article

LA Times Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

If you are feeling extremely depressed and possibly even suicidal, please call or text 988 (suicide hotline) or any loved one who you believe is immediately available. If you feel depressed and in need of a friendly community and unbiased emotional support, you can email Alex and Marty at emotionalsupportgroup@all4consolaws.org

 

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify or abbreviate their name. 
  24. Please check for typos, spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors before submitting.  Comments that have many errors will not be approved. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I wonder if this is retroactive. How many cases can be brought forth for “incidents” in the past 10 years or so?

And keep in mind, such cases would be considered crimes of force, which would automatically qualify for registrable offenses that trigger Internet inclusion.

Theoretically, we can see 20,000 new registrants added to the Internet shortly.

0
Reply
View Replies (1)

Every day I think I’m going to wake up to the sane world I was born into; and this Alice in ya gotta wonder about some people land nightmare will be over and things will be normal again. I’m still waiting.

0

This is one of the most ridiculous bills I’ve ever seen get passed! Do they really think college students will, in the heat of the moment, take the time to get a verbal yes before proceeding?

Yet another example of the state of California overreaching to exploit this group for political gain.

0
Reply
View Replies (2)

If neither party states yes to sex, who gets prosecuted? Both parties? With this law, students better have an attorney write a release form that can be ready at the bedside if sex is planned. Just get it signed before the mood is over.

0
Reply

Stupid…now breach of agreement /contract to ‘yes’ can become a jackpot as a person can change their ‘yes’ as very well but the agreement /contract was ‘yes’…that breach has what do they call it collateral consequences to a very good financial settlement $$$$$$amount. …..they better have a college course on that.

0
Reply