City of Orange Eliminates Presence Restrictions and Stops Enforcement of Residency Restrictions

In a vote of 4 to 1, the City Council for the City of Orange agreed on August 12 to eliminate all presence restrictions that prohibited registered citizens from visiting public libraries, parks, bus stops, schools and restaurants with playgrounds. The City Council also agreed to stop enforcement of its residency restrictions which prohibited more than one registered citizen staying in a local hotel or motel until the California Supreme Court determines whether residency restrictions are constitutional. The dissenting vote cast on this issue during the August 12 meeting was by Councilman Bilodeau who did not speak to the issue prior to his vote.

“This is a significant victory for more than 100,000 registered citizens and members of their families,” stated CA RSOL President Janice Bellucci. “No longer will they be denied access to public and private places.”

The City Council members refused in a previous council meeting to revise the city’s sex offender ordinance despite a strong recommendation from City Attorney Wayne Winthers to do so. Some of the City Council members stated during the Augusut 12 meeting that they were reluctantly agreeing to eliminate presence restrictions because it would save the city’s taxpayers an estimated $500,000 in legal fees. One member of the City Council acknowledged the California Court of Appeal decision which determined that a similar ordinance in the City of Irvine was preempted by state law.

California RSOL filed a lawsuit in federal district court challenging the city’s ordinance on June 17. The lawsuit was filed after California RSOL sent a series of letters to the City starting in January 2014. The letters notified the City of Orange that its ordinance violated the state and federal constitutions and warned that the city could be sued if it did not revise or repeal its ordinance. The City of Orange has agreed to pay attorneys fees and related costs in order to settle the lawsuit.

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

17 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Excellent! Another group of slime balls have decided to obey the law. Unwillingly; I’m sure. I think the primary motivating factor here was saving their collective butt’s in the eyes of their constituents by not taking this any further than they already have and getting a costly bee-ach throttling in a court of law. 🙂 I’ll bet they are resentful as hell they have to pay attorney fees and related costs. 🙂

I think I’ll visit the city of Orange this weekend, get a room for the night and make a quick stop in front of Orange High School, or perhaps the library, and take a selfie of me flipping the bird with a HUGE smile on my face 🙂 and then go visit my family. 🙂 🙂 🙂

Thanks again Janice! Once again you have proven the powers of good are stronger than obstinacy, unreasoning prejudice and foolishness.

I cannot figure out WHY these various cites do not do this as soon as these 3 things come together:

(1) receiving warning letters from CARSOL and
(2) the court decision and
(3) being advised by city attorney’s office to do it.

So they delay and now have to pay thousands of dollars, in taxpayer money, for dithering over a decision that is a foregone conclusion.

Its not like they “prove” anything by it…other than they are not responsible with the people’s money.

Woohooo the Orange Curtain (Orange County) has collapsed .. I can go visit my sister in Orange without being paranoid about cops following me and parked behind my car.. And I go with my sister and my nephews in the parks of Orange and Tustin without fear…

Thank you Janice! Thank you RSOL!

So what are the chances some politician decides to make the restrictions a state law? Will we finally have a legitimate case that registering is punishment?

Whewwwwwwwww…!….its also a HomeRun for our Constitution ……..it works.

I have said this before and do not even live in CA, but have family that does, now I will go visit. I am also glad that the cities have to pay legal fees, great job CARSOL. Stand together people that is how you win!

I see so much change in California, I just wish we could see it in more of a national level. I have so much respect for Janice and the members of CA RSOL, you are the ones who are working so hard for change, keep the good work up and hope your membership grows until you are able to demand a end to the registry.

I have seen far to many families hurt beyond belief , their children suffer far more than most know. Most just want to get their life back after they have paid for their crime but as it seems you can never get your life back.

Keep up the fight CA RSOL .