MD: Officials removing names from sex offender registry

BALTIMORE —The list of sex offenders on Maryland’s sex offender registry is shrinking because of a Maryland Court of Appeals ruling in June.

The ruling said corrections officials are legally required to remove the names of offenders who committed their crimes before 1995, when the state registry was created. The court ruled that Maryland can’t make those offenders register after the fact. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The same thing should happen here in California. Hat’s off to the Maryland Court of Appeals. 1,400 seems like a small number, but there are only 8.000 registrants in that state. But it’s a start, and hopefully other states; like California, will stand up and take notice. I take pleasure knowing that many aren’t happy about this, but then again, these are people that don’t seem to be able to differentiate between right and wrong.

The fact that Adam Rosenberg; executive director of the Baltimore Child abuse Center makes the statement “Oh, there is no question in my mind that dangerous people’s names are being taken off the list,” seemingly without any evidence to back his claim up indicates a lazy man, unwilling to stay informed on matters that directly affect his chosen field. I would not consider this man an expert, especially when empirical evidence clearly demonstrates that if this is what he truly believes, then he doesn’t know what he is talking about.

The flip side of the issue is Fred Berlin, associate professor at John Hopkins School of Medicine said “there’s very little data now showing that the sex offender registry has done anything to reduce sexual recidivism.” Removing these people from the registry isn’t going to place these people in any more danger that their imaginations already conjure up with allot of help from men like Adam Rosenberg. I hope California will dig deep and find the wisdom to realize the same truth the Maryland Court of Appeals realized.

This is hopefully going to start a trend throughout the Nation.