Jessica’s Law promised more than it could deliver

Jessica’s Law, the ballot measure to harness sex offenders, began eight years ago with a promise – one that parents whose daughters have disappeared, as well as law enforcement experts, now say lulled California into a false sense of security. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

6 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Well, as this editorial correctly indicates, the passage of Jessica’s laws was based on a series of very dubious premises and propaganda style claims. I am simply shocked, shocked that these premises and claims are now being revealed for what they have been all along: false and politically motivated statements made to gull people into voting for a bad law that fails to accomplish anything worthwhile. The whole thing ought to be tossed out, I see no value in it.

Jessica’s Law promised more than it could deliver?!?!!???

Gee; imagine that. Perhaps some empirical studies and pilot test run could have shown what a wast of time and effort, as well as $ Jessica’s Law was before it was ever made into law. What a shame num nuts Steve Ipsen didnt use his brain properly at the time this was being proposed. It’s a sad thing we are cursed with men and women of his stripe.

Let’s get rid of it. It was flawed from the start and they used blatantly exaggerated numbers to influence voters.

Everybody is lured into a false sense of security with everything dealing with SO laws. The registry is useless and gets bigger by the minute, leaving it in a complete mess for anyone to oversee it. Jessica’s law is and has been absurd all along and only created homelessness, something nobody deems to be an effective way to monitor. Hopefully, things will be moving into the right direction soon, and people will finally see the majority of SOs are just labeled as such, because some people decide what should be considered a sex crime.

Well if the supreme court rules that jessicas law applies to all rso then it will mean tens of thousands of people will have to move. That’s a lot of people that will be affected. On the positive side if that does happen I really think the courts and the state are going to have their hands full with the number of challenges to their rso laws as a whole. After all now people will have to fight back in order to save their homes and property instead of sitting on the sidelines because the laws haven’t affected them severly enough yet for them to get into the fight.