Sex-Offender Laws to Be Weakened

Prompted by two adverse appellate court decisions and a lawsuit springing from them, the board of supervisors on Tuesday gave tentative approval to amendments to the county code that would strike down certain provisions defining where registered sex offenders may visit when children are present.

The changes, due for a final vote on Feb. 10, would repeal the so-called “presence” provisions in the county code, language that prevents sex offenders from being within 300 feet of various locations where children might congregate. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

7 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

1. Not all sex offenses involve children
2. Not all sex offenses involving children are hands on offenses
3. Not all hands on offenses are necessarily hands on
4. Not all sex offenses require nudity or sex acts of any kind
5. Some sex offenses are sex offenses in one place but not another
6. Prepubescent children are on the sex offender registry
7. Prepubescent teens are also on the registry
8. The so called laws are flawed anyway because preventing future crimes has little to do with monitoring former offenders and a lot to do with stopping people from becoming offenders or victims in the first place.
9. Given how much research has been conducted to treat or provide counseling for offenders one would reasonably believe the mental health community has a firm grasp on how offenses can happen. So why isn’t that knowledge being used to create pre offense awareness and diversion from committing offenses? If its because no one cares enough to stop more victims from being created then society as a whole is as much at fault for future offenses as the offenders themselves and that is beyond tragic.

These “laws” are like a game of ping-pong they lessen one and tighten another so no progress is ever really made if you are truthful about it.

In reality it is totally unfair to make sex offenders (with the obvious exception of serial predators) be on a registry and certainly with no way off even with decades of “good behavior”!

So now you can go to a park…but you can’t internationally travel. Ping-pong!

“anti-predator ordinances??????” I’ve never preyed upon anyone!

We have to comment online in the article to get people’s attention and educate them. I did. Next?

I like that … Sounds like toads croaking that’s what they are bunch of toads croaking and others following