VA: Sex offender registry – Bad idea (OpEd)

Virginia lawmakers introduce many bad ideas, but they also wisely dispense with a good proportion of them. One of those that has escaped the ax comes from state Sen. Ryan McDougle, and would establish a supplemental sex-offender registry.

The supplemental registry, which would be published on the State Police website, would include the names of persons who committed various offenses between 1980 and 1994. Full OpEd Piece

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Yes violate the constitutional protected against ex post facto punishment and beat your chest at the same time claiming a victory against an imagined threat. Way to go McDougle!

“…It would include the location and nature of the offense, and the offender’s date of birth — but no mug shots or other identifying information.”

Interesting. As noxious as this is, it’s much less oppressive than the 290 PC law we have here in California (let alone the supplementary legislation of the many subjacent communities like Carson). So, in an ostensibly “liberal”, “left coast” state we have long-ago enacted more reactionary regulations than only being contemplated in a state like Virginia – bastion of progressive thinking that we know it to be.

More evidence for me that this is not a left/right problem but a fear/ignorance problem that anyone can fall prey to regardless of political persuasion.

You know its sad that the USA has came to this state of affairs with the sex registry that they have to reap off of others misfortunes just to glorify in there great government and there pride and ego. They make tons of money off the sex restraint and also get funding for all this so they are in a sense playing a shell game with all this. The bible says one reaps what they sow and if government wants to downgrade offenders, especially the sex offender, than its wrong. I am an offender but to this day I don’t know who I offend. Cannot government see this registry as panic at its best.
So what’s wrong with these registry’s and sub registry’s, they just compound things even more.