WI: Bill would crack down on homeless sex offenders

MADISON (WITI) — They are tough to track and they’re roaming the streets. The number of homeless sex offenders are on the rise, and there’s a new plan to fix the problem. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

10 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Oh; sure… divert attention away from the total failure that is the sex offender registry by enacting yet another law. Even though I think this one could benefit the citizens forced to register as a sex offenders, it won’t work until all the cities and towns agree to work together. I hope this bill passes for the sake of all the registrants forced to live as homeless people because the government refuses to acknowledge the truth; that the registry doesn’t work in any way, shape or form. Good laws do not harm anyone.

Kind of misleading headlines. I think this is showing the pendulum is swinging, slow but swinging.

It is unfortunate that the State of Wisconsin plans to do what the CA Supreme Court and Sex Offender Management Board have determined don’t work — adopt residency restrictions. It is ironic that Wisconsin believes this will help to solve the problem of homeless registered citizens. In direct contrast, the number of homeless registered citizens more than doubled in California after Jessica’s Law was passed.

Does anyone know, generally speaking, if one must follow a state’s residency restrictions if they no longer live in that state but are forced to continue registering?

While the hundreds of local laws in WI are impossible to follow WI should just ban all residency and presence restrictions at a state level vs. enacting their own.

Still I believe the intent is more to ‘help’ registered citizens than to hurt. A little step forward.

Dumb dum wisconsin …backwards decisions only makes for costly and dangerous results in the scheme …. look at those guys on trial in that orange county serial crime…the problem was they were homeless ……had california helped as you wisconsin will need to do now…is give each registered one thousand dollars per month for housing costs and the higher the tier the higher dollar figures to say $1500.– per month….housing registered citizens and opportunity of job is best for all and in the best public interest.

“Once they are off the grid, then you really have something to be afraid of. This is a workable solution,” Rep. Kleefish said.

This is nothing but fear propaganda! Megan’s Law is not a common sense approach to protecting society, much less a credible solution or a viable strategy for safeguarding children – In any capacity.

These Republicans are just securing their place in history right along side the Nazis for pushing this nonsense. Deception and manipulation.. using fear of something happening to their children for political gain. They have zero shame.