State Courts Strike Down Overbroad Residence Restrictions for People Convicted of Sex Offenses

Admin

After two decades of imposing increasingly harsh residence restrictions on people convicted of sex offenses, several key states are rejecting blanket restrictions. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This is definitely the Bellucci Principle in action. Virtually every decision outside of California has in fact referenced California’s easing of laws, which of course is a direct result of CA RSOL’s Janice Bellucci. I hereby christen the term as such.

0
Reply

Are you listening Mr & Mrs Runner? This is talking about those of us that are forced to register under 290. Did you know you are harming children and entire groups of innocents too Mr & Mrs Runner?

” the days are long since past when whole communities of persons, such as Native Americans and Japanese-Americans, may be lawfully banished from our midst,” the court wrote.”

0
Reply

Continued rhetoric, lies and other distortions are already planned by the haters.

Why couldn’t we get one dose of truth from them rather than constant denial from an abyss of humanity that orchestrates ex post facto punishment and arbitrary removal of constitutional rights of registrants.

I guess it is too far too complex of a problem for the Runners’ in order for them to see the outright damage done to the innocent children of registrants. Family values (NOT!) Can’t see the forest (damage) for the trees (votes)…

The only apparent truth here is that they are demagogues and using are every lie to ensure they keep the voters uninformed and stay elected at the same time.

Somewhere amidst all of this is conspiracy to violate the constitutional rights of registrants. How in anyone’s mind do these add up to worthy public servants?

Coffee, donuts and tough on crime drool is apparently a winning combo even if it is served with a heaping helping of lies.

0
Reply