A juvenile court did not violate a convicted teenager’s constitutional rights by requiring him to register as a sex offender, though he committed the sexual assault before the registry’s enactment, a Maryland appeals court held Tuesday. Article with Paywall
Related posts
-
MD: Legislators warned of ‘enormous liability’ related to sex abuse lawsuits
Source: marylandmatters.org 1/20/25 Potential settlement could cost taxpayers hundreds of millions, potentially billions for 3,500 cases... -
MD: 13-year-old boy charged for sex offense on University of Maryland campus
Source: dcnewsnow.com 10/18/24 COLLEGE PARK, Md. (DC News Now) — A 13-year-old boy was charged with... -
MD: Report details ‘staggering’ church sex abuse in Maryland
Source: apnews.com 4/5/23 BALTIMORE (AP) — More than 150 Catholic priests and others associated with the...
More stupidity that needs to be overturned…
I thought these registries were to protect kids; not totally destroy their lives.
Didn’t the Maryland Supreme Court recently say that ex post facto registration was unconstitutional?
Sick!