WI: Manitowoc sex offender ordinance approved

Convicted sex offenders from outside Manitowoc can no longer legally be placed within the city limits after the City Council approved an ordinance regulating such placements.

The council Dec. 21 unanimously approved the ordinance, which prohibits any convicted sex offender from residing or being placed on supervised release within the city limits unless the offender lived in the city at the time of the offense or previously resided in the city for more than five years. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

6 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Well, I actually visited Wisconson this year for the first time. It’s a very beautiful state and very rural. Truly beautiful. So, it’s very disappointing to see such laws pass. Very hateful. In today’s world, you can’t turn a TV on and avoid watching something with sexual content. I’ve even been rather shocked by cartoon content as well/I have children. We live in another world. People need to realize that hate will get you no where. As we are all aware, everyone has problems. Yet, society continue or legislators continue to pass these hateful and truly demoralizing laws that provide nothing more than a false sense of security. When people are arrested for drugs/alcohol/or spousal abuse, they are treated humanely and required to under go counseling and treatment is provided. I just don’t get it. I suggest (i.e.: Florida/Texas) need to take the same approach and begin to treat and provide registered citizens with the same approach. Preventing people from living in certain locations/attending Church/visiting parks/beaches is very disturbing. I’m honestly in a state of shock. I pay taxes ect and I could potentially be prohibited from visiting a beach? That is shocking. What’s next? (Mountains/malls/libraries/pool/dog park/restaurant/tennis court/school/Costco/drive at night). I believe in the end these laws won’t prevail. This is another reason why California needs to pass a tiered system. Pleading to a sex offense could now potentially ban a person for life ! (For an expunged misdemeanor)

Well stated Timmr. ALthough, for someone like myself, I plead to a battery/massage parlor over 20 years ago/Summary Probation and I could possibly be banned from visiting a park? This is nuts! California needs to wake up and if they are going to pass this crazy laws, focus upon passing a tiered system first. In most states, I would have fallen off the registry 10 years ago.