ACSOL Members Conclude Early Lobbying Efforts (update from 1/31)

February 1:

After meeting in the offices of all newly elected members of the state legislature as well as members of the Senate Public Safety Committee, more than 35 ACSOL members concluded their early lobbying efforts on January 31.

“We educated the newly elected members and staff regarding the need for a tiered registry based upon empirical evidence as well as the harm that could be caused by prohibiting all registrants from visiting all K-12 schools for all reasons,” stated ACSOL president Janice Bellucci.

The ACSOL members were organized into four teams led by individuals who have considerable lobbying experience. Each team included at least one registrant, one family member and a professional who supports registrants.

“This is the largest number of people to lobby in Sacramento in support of registrant issues,” stated Bellucci. “We thank each and every one of them.”

ACSOL has led lobbying efforts in Sacramento for five years and during that time has successfully defeated many bills that would have harmed registrants and their families. For example, bills were introduced that would have allowed cities and counties to reinstate proximity restrictions. If the bills had passed, they would have prohibited all registrants from visiting public and private places such as parks, beaches, libraries, museums and movie theaters.

Future lobbying efforts will include testimony before committees that consider bills affecting registrants. Although no hearing dates have yet been set, they are expected to begin in early March. ACSOL members will be invited to participate in those hearings as well as to write letters and make phone calls in support of or in opposition to pending legislation. That information will be posted on this website as soon as it is available.

January 31: 

More than 35 people — including registrants, family members and supporters — lobbied newly elected members of the state senate and assembly in Sacramento on January 30.  The messages they carried were opposition to Senate Bill 26 and support for the concept of a tiered registry.

If passed and signed into law, Senate Bill 26 would prohibit all registrants, including parents, from visiting all schools (grades K-12) for all reasons.  The prohibition could prevent some registrants from voting, others from attending church services and many more from working on campus even when students are not present.  A tiered registry bill has not yet been introduced and therefore it has no bill number.  The bill is one of hundreds being finalized in the Office of Legislative Counsel.

“Our voices were heard in the State Capitol on issues of great importance to more than 100,000 families,” stated ACSOL president Janice Bellucci. “For many people, it was the first time they have been heard by elected officials.”

The lobbying effort included four teams, led by experienced lobbyists, that included by scheduled and unscheduled meetings.  Before lobbying, ACSOL trained individuals in basic lobbying techniques.

In addition to meeting in the offices of newly elected members, the lobbying teams met in the offices of members of the Senate Public Safety Committee.  Both Senate Bill 26 and the tiered registry bill will be referred to that committee before consideration by the full Senate and then the Assembly.

The ACSOL lobbying effort will extend to a second day on January 31 and be followed by letters and phone calls.  Committee hearings on the bills are expected to begin in March and the dates of those hearings will be announced both on this website.

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

19 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

As a member of the lobbying team, I felt good yesterday because we imparted information they did not have previously. Please come join us next time!

It was great meeting all of the new people who showed up to lobby in Sacramento. The infusion of new ideas is sure to take our cause to the next level!

Once again a fantastic experience bringing truth to myth. Thank you everyone for showing up, standing up and speaking up!

I never thought of myself as a lobbyist, but that too is what I am. I am thankful for Janice all those that showed up, stood up and spoke up. I wasn’t able to attend this event but look forward to it in the future.

Working on things a little behind the scenes. Blessings ALL.

I would have attended, but I am dealing in legal matters relating to an internet thug. Many of you know who I am talking about.

Thank you all for your efforts in our State’s Capitol!

Thank you all for your efforts! We are with you in spirit! I hope everyone that wasn’t able to make it has at least helped contribute donations to the efforts. Keep up the ‘myth-to-truth movement’ everyone!

Thank you for giving our family a venue to talk about how the registry laws have adversely effected us. Thank you to the other parents, children, spouses, and siblings who came out to tell their stories. Thank you to the legislators and staff who made time for us, and thank you to Janice for giving us a voice. I can’t imagine what it was like to be a registrant in any of those meetings, but I think that it was really brave.

I was very pleased with how each person there conveyed their stories, and feel like the messages were well received by many.

For the first time in years, we seem to have bi-partisan support on a concept of a tiered registry. This was an amazing group who decided to show up, stand up and speak up.

I was filled with hope as I saw the positive reception we received at each legislator’s office! We gave them our recommendations, told our personal stories of how the proposed laws would affect us, answered questions, and left them with lots of information. Just 5 years ago, no one was doing that and the anti-RC bills were flooding in. Five years later, only 2 RC bills have been submitted so far this year. Progress! The anti-RC pendulum is slowly swinging in our favor.

If you are an RC feeling depressed and hopeless about the way we RCs are treated, below is an “action prescription” to feel a massive infusion of hope.

If you are a Californian:
* Join us next time we go to the Capitol.
* Write letters when you receive an alert.

All RCs and supporters:
* Sign up for the email action alerts.
* Listen to our phone conferences to stay informed.
* Regularly view this website to stay up on the latest news.
* Donate regularly to help us fight Federal and California legal issues (the more RC-progressive we can make California, the more that will spread across the nation!).

That is just awesome. Thanks to everyone who showed up to lobby, and to Janice for leading the way.

Does anybody know the bill # of the tiered registry bill? Is it on the state assembly site?