Texas rules barring some sex offenders from using certain websites were thrown into jeopardy Monday morning after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a similar statute in North Carolina violates the First Amendment. Full Article
Related posts
-
Janice’s Journal: The Importance of Tenacity
On March 3, a group of individuals representing dozens of organizations will gather near the steps... -
TX: Texas Cops Seized Photographs From a Museum and Launched Child Pornography Investigation
Source: reason.com 2/21/25 “It’s shameful that government officials would use the criminal legal process to censor... -
TX: Texas lawmaker introduces bill named after 11-year-old girl murdered in 2024
Source: kvue.com 1/23/25 AUSTIN, Texas — A new bill would change the requirements for registering as...
This doesn’t affect anything in Texas.
Probation and Parole can restrict anything they want to within reason.
I’ve got this restriction during probation. Anyone is free to challenge it as not related to their crime, but most don’t care enough to pay a lawyer to do that. Restrictions on parole or probation aren’t supposed to be mandatory to all that committed specific crimes and are supposed to be tailored to the individual but that hardly ever happens and it’s hard to afford an attorney to challenge it. The Packingham case doesn’t change any of this one way or the other.
What’s the Texas address? I’ll send them a dollar to wipe their tears.
“…registered sex offenders disproportionately commit additional sex crimes online…”
What the EFF??????? Where do these stupid morons come up with this crap????