Texas rules barring some sex offenders from using certain websites were thrown into jeopardy Monday morning after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a similar statute in North Carolina violates the First Amendment. Full Article
Related posts
-
TX: NARSOL Sues Texas for Excluding Federal Convictions from State Registry Removal
Source: floridaactioncommittee.org 2/26/26 NARSOL has filed suit on behalf of registrants in Texas who were convicted... -
TX: ‘Caught in the middle’: Raymondville police helped by, but can’t encourage, online predator hunters
Source: valleycentral.com 12/16/25 RAYMONDVILLE, Texas (ValleyCentral) — On Thursday, Raymondville police arrested Christian Tijerina, who now... -
TX: Fort Worth has few restrictions on where sex offenders can live. Will that change?
Source: star-telegram.com 11/5/25 Registered sex offenders in Fort Worth can, mostly, live where they want to...

This doesn’t affect anything in Texas.
Probation and Parole can restrict anything they want to within reason.
I’ve got this restriction during probation. Anyone is free to challenge it as not related to their crime, but most don’t care enough to pay a lawyer to do that. Restrictions on parole or probation aren’t supposed to be mandatory to all that committed specific crimes and are supposed to be tailored to the individual but that hardly ever happens and it’s hard to afford an attorney to challenge it. The Packingham case doesn’t change any of this one way or the other.
What’s the Texas address? I’ll send them a dollar to wipe their tears.
“…registered sex offenders disproportionately commit additional sex crimes online…”
What the EFF??????? Where do these stupid morons come up with this crap????