Texas rules barring some sex offenders from using certain websites were thrown into jeopardy Monday morning after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a similar statute in North Carolina violates the First Amendment. Full Article
Related posts
-
TX: Texas city passes residency restriction to banish registrants
Source: abc7amarillo.com 4/23/25 HEREFORD, Texas (KVII) — The Hereford City Commission has enacted a new ordinance that... -
TX: ‘Audrii’s Law’ aims to close loophole in sex offender registry
Source: msn.com 3/25/25 In Austin on Tuesday, the family of Audrii Cunningham strongly urged Texas lawmakers... -
TX: Stop Bill HB 3499 or Texas registrants will no longer receive property tax exemption
Source: capitol.texas.gov 2/27/25 Bill HB 3499 text: Relating to the eligibility of an individual to receive...
This doesn’t affect anything in Texas.
Probation and Parole can restrict anything they want to within reason.
I’ve got this restriction during probation. Anyone is free to challenge it as not related to their crime, but most don’t care enough to pay a lawyer to do that. Restrictions on parole or probation aren’t supposed to be mandatory to all that committed specific crimes and are supposed to be tailored to the individual but that hardly ever happens and it’s hard to afford an attorney to challenge it. The Packingham case doesn’t change any of this one way or the other.
What’s the Texas address? I’ll send them a dollar to wipe their tears.
“…registered sex offenders disproportionately commit additional sex crimes online…”
What the EFF??????? Where do these stupid morons come up with this crap????