OR: New law means life sentences for second-strike sex offenders

Repeat rapists and certain sex offenders can now be given a “two strikes and you’re out” ticket to life in prison under a bill recently passed by the Oregon Legislature.

Senate Bill 1050 imposes presumptive sentences for those convicted of first-degree rape, first-degree sodomy or first-degree unlawful sexual penetration if the defendant has been previously convicted of those crimes or an equivalent federal offense. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

29 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

So, one of the most liberal states in the country passed this. To my fellow RCs, we need to wise up! I’ve seen so many here be quick to talk about Republicans/conservatives as if they were the problem. This should tell you that both sides of the aisle are against us if they think they can use us for their own benefit.

Trump would throw any one of us under the bus for his benefit. As for Republican states, they tend to have the most harsh SO laws: AL, FL, NV, SC, TX for example. I mean just look at the politicians who spoke out against SB 421, mostly Republicans in a blue state. Democrats are neither our friends. But Democrats tend to be the lesser of two evil. Just look at Smith v. Doe as example. Ginsburg, Breyer, and Stevens were the only three that wrote dissent. Ginsburg, Breyer, and Stevens also happen to be ‘liberal.’

I actually don’t have a problem with this type of law. For certain types of repeat rapists, etc., why wouldn’t you want harsh sentences?

I’m all for getting rid of the registry, all ex-pose-facto laws, etc. It’s obviously unconstitutional. But, I think sometimes on this board we play the victim too much. Someone who repeatably rapes a child should not be roaming the streets. He (or she) has proven they cannot function in society. They need to be put away. That has nothing to do with being on a registry. There are bad people who do bad things, and they need to be punished.

That’s been my line of thinking all along. If a person did something vile enough, don’t put them on a registry that does nothing to actually protect anyone. Lock them up.