ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings: Nov 21, Dec 19 – Details / Recordings

Emotional Support Group Meetings 2020 (Phone only)


WI: Sex offender sentenced to forfeit property to county

A convicted sex offender’s home has been sold and the Rock County Sheriff’s office is getting the money from it. Full Article

Join the discussion

  1. AlexO

    I’m not defending the man’s actions, but how does this forfeiture work? It’s not imminent domain (for which he’d get to keep funds). It’s not him being forced to sell his home in order to pay reparations to his victims. And it’s not a fraud case in which the government is seizing assets to pay back those wrong. What law allows property to be seized in this manner?

    • Michael

      I would think they used the same laws that are used against drug dealers. Asset forfeiture laws allow the federal and state governments to seize property that have been used in the commission of a crime.

      • Eric Knight

        The problem with asset forfeiture laws are they are designed to apply ONLY to items and materials that were implicit in the actual crime, and must be proportional to the crime. Unless it was proven that he bought the house specifically to commit the crime (i.e., view child porn or produce child porn), then asset forfeiture in this case is (or should be) unconstitutional.

        Asset forfeiture laws have gotten out of control around the country, but sex crimes are the only crimes that I’ve heard of where entire properties are taken from suspects. They do this for obvious public stunts. I remember when someone was caught in an Internet sting where they took the suspects car and crushed it, and he still had payments to make on the car, which the city said they would force him to pay once he was let out of prison in 40 years or so. I kid you not.

  2. ReadyToFight

    I can only assume they sold his house because where he’s going he ain’t gonna need it, he’s prolly gonna die in prison, and most likely has no family to take control of the property.
    This guy sounds like a real predator so… no sympathy from me.

  3. AlexO

    It’s probably true in terms of him likely no longer being able to access the property, but that still doesn’t explain how the city can claim it? If he still had a mortgage and would default on it, then the bank gets the house like normal. If he owns it out right, then the county could eventually get the property after he fails to keep up with property taxes. But how did it directly go to the sheriffs office so quickly? There are a lot of abandoned property out there that isn’t taken away form people.

    • That David

      Likely they determined that his house was used in the process of committing the crime. Not a stretch from what it sounds like. Pretty standard civil asset forfeiture case from there. Just a huge asset this time.

    • AJ

      I agree. Run of the mill civil asset forfeiture. Had he been exonerated (regardless the crime), I would have had huge heartburn about it. This is not really a sex offender story, it’s a forfeiture story involving CP production. This happens all the time with meth cookers and the like.

  4. AlexO

    That makes sense. If the entire property was “evidence”, they take it and then liquidate it, just like any police auction. Thanks! I knew there had to be a simple explanation.

  5. Bb

    Who cares!!! Move on.

  6. Stephen

    It’s a no win, it was used to commit a crime, Everything in that house can be taking.
    Just being Suspected of a crime lets them grab it. This issue is in the Courts because of people having the cops taking Money from lawful people while driving. You all need to read more than just RC stuff.
    Here’s a site to follow.

  7. Nondescript

    Hmm. Interesting. I wonder if they take people’s cars after they’ve pled guilty to reckless endangerment, road rage or DUIs, too.

    • AJ

      TN, for one, does for DUIs: “Property may be seized for possession of narcotics, illegal or prescription. Vehicles may be seized for driving on a driver’s license which has been revoked for driving under the influence (DUI) and for driving under the influence (DUI) for a second or subsequent time. Both DUI charges must have occurred within five (5) years of each other.” (

Leave a Reply

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *