The Autistic Children Who Are Labeled As Sex Offenders


Anthony*, a 14-year-old autistic boy, was making awkward overtures to his crush. Other kids thought the courtship was cute until, according to his attorney, Nicole Pittman of Impact Justice , Anthony got frustrated and sent his crush a picture of his genitals. “Parents flipped out,” Pittman told Broadly, explaining that they requested authorities press charges against the teen. Now, Anthony is listed on the sex offender registry. He can no longer attend school or even be left alone in a room with his little brothers.

Read more


Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Now the kid has TWO stigmas to deal with, or attempt to live with. Way to go lawmakers.

Pittman believes that judges understand the problem but are reluctant to treat children with autism differently than adult offenders, recalling one judge who told her, “I understand what you’re saying, but I’ll be looked at as soft on sex offenders.”
And yet proponents (and SCOTUS in Smith) claim there’s no shaming involved. The judge himself/herself is afraid of “second-hand shaming”!
For nearly 20 years, the 17th Circuit Court of Kent County has allowed children to plead to what D’Orio describes as a “a lesser, non-registerable offense.”
Allowing them to plead to non-registerable offenses merely dodges the real issue…and at the same time highlights the worthlessness of registries: some on it are there due to prosecutorial discretion.

Man, these stories get my blood boiling. The parents who insisted on pressing charges, the DA, the judge and anyone else involved with convicting and forcing this kid to register should be outed and publicly shamed as child abusers. If he were my son they’d suffer far, far worse.

I like the word, “Gulags”. That is so fitting !!!! Passing out 5’s,10’s, 25’s, just like old Russia, and even worse here, passing out life terms. Worse then the gulags !!!!!!!!!The only thing they are lacking are the labor camps in Siberia. So much for our capitalistic, constitutional republic….Another failed attempt to create some kind of Utopian civilization with a government that doesn’t turn tyrannical………..Communism, Socialism, Marxism, now add Capitalism and a constitutional democratic republic, all failures………