PA: Montgomery County lawmaker wants only sex offenders on state sex offender registry

Admin

Sen. Stewart Greenleaf plans to introduce a bill that would keep individuals convicted of crimes where there is no sexual motivation from ended up on the states sex offender registry. The lawmaker cited data that shows individuals with no sex crime accusations are being labeled as sex offenders.Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

6 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Essentially, if someone kidnaps, beats, assaults, maims, or kills a kid but don’t have any sexual connotation, he wants them off the registry. If someone shows his peepee accidentally while relieving himself on the side a a road, however, it’s lifetime on the shaming sheet for that guy.

0
Reply

What concerns to user is that the very man who argued on behalf of upholding the Alaskan version of the Whetterling act against ex-post scrutiny became the top man. No coincidence given the deep state’s need for ruling to create a way to gain unfettered use(s) of its databases in Utah. While most think the case was about the child sex offender when it was actually about the database.

SCORE
DATABASE 1
INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY 0

0
Reply
View Replies (1)

Just change the stupid name to “past offenders registry”. It’s just as ineffective as a registry but more fair and accurate a label. Since when is having a sexual experience as a minor, no matter how non violent, become more threatening than someone that beats up a child to a pulp. I have been struck by adults. I still mistrust authority especially ones saying they are hitting you for the good of children.

0
Reply
View Replies (1)

Sounds like what he is looking for was what was in the Jacob Wetterling Act, which only effected people who committed sexually violent offenses or offenses against children, not the public pee-er, etc.

0
Reply