Sen. Stewart Greenleaf plans to introduce a bill that would keep individuals convicted of crimes where there is no sexual motivation from ended up on the states sex offender registry. The lawmaker cited data that shows individuals with no sex crime accusations are being labeled as sex offenders.Full Article
Related posts
-
PA: Bill seeks to close ‘loophole’ for AI-generated child sexual abuse materials
Source: penncapital-star.com 11/10/25 A two-hour state Senate committee hearing explored the use of artificial intelligence to... -
PA: Stuck in 1995 Rally Marks 30 Years of Failed Policies
Source: parsol.org 10/28/25 HARRISBURG, PA – October 28, 2025 – The Pennsylvania Association for Rational Sexual Offense Laws (PARSOL)... -
PA: Being suspected of child abuse can land you in this Pa. database — even without a conviction
Source: timesleader.com 10/2/25 To protect kids, Pennsylvania maintains a registry of people convicted and suspected of...

Essentially, if someone kidnaps, beats, assaults, maims, or kills a kid but don’t have any sexual connotation, he wants them off the registry. If someone shows his peepee accidentally while relieving himself on the side a a road, however, it’s lifetime on the shaming sheet for that guy.
What concerns to user is that the very man who argued on behalf of upholding the Alaskan version of the Whetterling act against ex-post scrutiny became the top man. No coincidence given the deep state’s need for ruling to create a way to gain unfettered use(s) of its databases in Utah. While most think the case was about the child sex offender when it was actually about the database.
SCORE
DATABASE 1
INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY 0
Just change the stupid name to “past offenders registry”. It’s just as ineffective as a registry but more fair and accurate a label. Since when is having a sexual experience as a minor, no matter how non violent, become more threatening than someone that beats up a child to a pulp. I have been struck by adults. I still mistrust authority especially ones saying they are hitting you for the good of children.
Sounds like what he is looking for was what was in the Jacob Wetterling Act, which only effected people who committed sexually violent offenses or offenses against children, not the public pee-er, etc.