A long-running class-action lawsuit over the constitutionally of Minnesota’s civil commitment program for sex offenders effectively ended Thursday when a federal judge dismissed the remaining claims but stood by his earlier statements that some revelations during the six-week trial shock his conscience. Full Article
Related posts
-
Civil Commitment and the Criminalization of Homelessness
Source: petrieflom.law.harvard.edu 10/24/25 In July, President Donald Trump issued an Executive Order titled “Ending Crime and... -
Iowa Ignores Civil Commitment Concerns
Source: yahoo.com 7/27/25 Two years have passed since families and advocates of incarcerated individuals demanded to... -
They Served Their Time. But They May Still Die in State Custody.
Source: theappeal.org 4/21/25 In half the country, sex offense civil commitment incarcerates people after they complete...

Your shock is worthless if you’re going to still rule against this. You’re a judge. If a law is that bad, do something about it. Don’t be shocked at the ovens and their purpose, but continue to stand by their use.
This judge has no gonads. He continually defers judgements.
This is extremely horrifying wether you are a male or female. This reminds me of the past when people were locked up in asylums indeffently. Horrible experments were performed on them in a lot of the asylums. I wonder exactly what is happening in these places.
Shocked by procedures enacted upon sex offenders? Abolish the registry. There will immediately be zero sex offenders on which to enact such procedures.