ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings | Recordings (7/10 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings


The Truth Could Set Them Free

Why did California destroy research into a group of people it says are dangerous enough to be locked up indefinitely?

In late 2006, a public defender went before a Napa County judge to argue for his client’s freedom. ____ _____, a 49-year-old man, had been detained for seven years at Atascadero State Hospital under a 1995 California law authorizing “civil commitment” of people who have been convicted of sex offenses, a practice that keeps them confined long after they have completed their sentences. Full Article

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments


⭐⭐⭐ Excellent article!! A must-read!! 👍

When I was in SO treatment from 1988-1993 a therapist was claiming re-offense rate as high at 80%, There 25 in the group and out of that group there was one that offended. My PO whom supervised about 40 SO said, he had only 3 re-offended sexually. One day when this therapist was on her soap-box of hysteria. I asked her do she has any support about her claim and she replied “it was her feeling that they were high”. Than I brought her attention to really of the group and what my PO told me that it appears the re-offense rates are actually very low and she said “that did not mean anything to her”. The point I am making is that the re-offense rate was always low and the treatment providers has purposely distorted the numbers for the support of their careers

Keep in mind that at heart of this article is the following paper, which delved into Dr. Padilla’s suppressed research into Karl Hanson’s highly flawed Static 99 (which, surprisingly, the Static is no where mentioned in the linked article above):

Keep in mind that the Static 99’s flawed methodology will be a big part of our future laws, including the Tiered Registry.

It’s history repeating itself. This time, though, many government-sponsored scam artists have created a massive web of “scientific studies” to “validate” the “science.”

This is highly troubling and disturbing, straight out of Orwell’s 1984.

God help us all.


Is there not science to oppose the web being built which can be used to argue with? Fight science with science

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x