NC: New NC bill would push sex offenders further away from school grounds

[myfox8.com – 2/10/21 – NC residents write and call!]

CHARLOTTE, N.C. (FOX 46 CHARLOTTE) – Right now, in some North Carolina counties, sex offenders can live right beyond 1,000 of the front door of a school due to the way current laws are written. Now, one lawmaker is pushing to make sure they’re further away from those properties.

In some areas, sex offenders could theoretically live right up to the school’s fencing if the yard is big enough, but if Senate Bill 52 passes, sex offenders won’t be able to live 1,000 from the property line or wherever the school’s land ends.

Senator Sawyer said this bill will be voted on next week and she believes it will get bipartisan support.

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

“My cousin’s daughter was actually kidnapped. She was 14, and a man came up to her and her friend and pulled a gun on them and forced them into a van. Luckily, she fought for the wheel and got away. So the further away people can be from my children, the better,” Stucker said.

And how exactly would this new change would’ve prevented what your cousins daughter experienced? Was the person a registrant? Did he do it form his front/backyard while she was walking by?

Oh look, another child abuser exploiting children for politically and personal gain…. and I mean child abuser. So far the laws have barely effected me.. but definitely affect my 2 year old daughter. Anyone who makes a law that hurts the mental well being of a child is a child abuser in my eyes.
Question.. what are the laws with us on premise restrictions on schools and daycares? I know certain offenders have the premise restrictions, but I am one of the lucky few who doesn’t. And I have a daughter. Am I allowed to pick up and drop off my daughter at a day care? I can’t find any law against it. Even in local ordinances. Yet I hear of registrants getting arrested for that very thing. I never hear the ending verdict.. but still.. also… Am I allowed to even live with my daughter? The judge okayed it. She wasn’t the victim.. yet nc statute is as followed..
Nc statute 208.17
B It shall be unlawful for any person to conduct any activity at his or her residence where the person:

(1) Accepts a minor or minors into his or her care or custody from another, and

(2) Knows that a person who resides at that same location is required to register under this Article.

(c) A violation of this section is a Class F felony. (2006-247, s. 11(b).)

Sounds like Amber fell into the government propaganda of fearing strangers; while opening up to people in her circle who could actually harm her children. Just because a registrant lives by a school doesn’t mean they are watching kids scroll by on the way to school. I bet that if something happened to a kid they wouldn’t rush out to help because of the hatred caused by immoral people.

North Carolina is awful but Florida’s worse. Leave it to Florida man.