Racial Disparities Found in Federal Sex Crime Sentencing

[thecrimereport.org – 2/10/21]

Researchers at the University of Texas at San Antonio found that Black and Hispanic Americans charged in federal sex abuse cases are receiving disproportionately harsher sentences

In a recent study published in the journal Sexual Abuse, the researchers explored what they said was a trend in more severe punishment over the past decade since Congress has enacted several pieces of legislation aimed at increasing the punishment in federal sex offender and child pornography cases.

The researchers University of Texas at San Antonio criminology and criminal justice professors Richard Hartley and Alexander Testa, and alumnus Erika Martinez, noted that convictions in federal courts have increased over the last two decades.

Most studies of federal sentencing have focused on “understanding what influences judicial decisions and whether racial/ethnic disparities in federal sentencing practices exist, regardless of the type of crime charged,” Hartley explained in an interview with the university journal, UTSA Today.

“Little research, however, has examined the determinants of sentencing outcomes for those convicted of federal sex offenses.”

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

6 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

It’s been known to authorities that the majority of registrants are black for years.

No different in the DoD either when it comes to investigating and prosecuting the same even though convictions are not more than white members. The effect is still the same as a conviction afterwards with stigma, etc. https://www.militarytimes.com/news/pentagon-congress/2020/06/16/frustrated-advocates-say-racial-biases-within-military-justice-system-remain-despite-repeated-alarms/

Any time discrimination is documented it should work in favor of those being discriminated. In a just world where politics, money and power weren’t the motivating forces we would see the NAACP, The Black Caucus, BLM, legions of law firms, judges, and DA’s lining up and filing suits to get this oppressive, abusive, thoroughly unconstitutional registry shut down. But alas, integrity and ethics do not appear to be the driving force in America today so we will have to see if anyone will risk their political clout by standing up for real justice.

It’s just coming to light that the Wisconsin Supreme Court has been sitting on a study showing racial bias in sentencing in WI for quite some time. Here’s a draft version of the study called, “Race and Prison Sentencing in Wisconsin”.

https://beta.documentcloud.org/documents/20478391-race-prison-sentence-felony-report-draft_2020_02_05

Reduced sentencing and early release programs for those of color, none of it means a damn thing when those who have completed their sentences continue to be treated as “lepers” in the eyes of the law and in society. The law and society need to change their terminology from the everyone painted with the same brushstroke
“sex offender” to registered person, or person “required to register” or better yet, get rid of the registry altogether. Since every group on earth wants us to use the “politically correct” term for their particular group, then registrants DESERVE and need to insist on the same “politically correct” terms.
Reduced sentences and early release mean nothing when registrants can’t find housing, jobs or begin relationships because the world has decided they are all “unworthy offenders of sexual offenses.” It’s time for the world to wake up, and it all starts with the laws.