CA: East County neighbors angered over plan to house sex offender

[fox5sandiego.com – 4/2/21]

EL CAJON, Calif. – Residents in unincorporated El Cajon are pushing back ahead of a hearing this month that could place a man convicted of multiple sexual assaults in a supervised home in their neighborhood.

A hearing will be held next month to determine whether to place Douglas ____, a 78-year-old man convicted of several sexual assaults, in a supervised home in unincorporated El Cajon. (Provided)

The hearing is scheduled for April 20 after California’s Department of State Hospitals recommended 78-year-old Douglas ____placed in a home on Horizon Hills Drive. Douglas ____, was convicted of sexually assaulting male hitchhikers dating back to the mid-1970s, according to the San Diego County District Attorney’s Office.

His crimes span five separate counties, including San Diego County, the office said.

Neighbors found out about the hearing this week and some already are making their positions known with signs posted outside which read, “Predators not welcome.”

“It’s crazy,” said Kelley Deriemer, who lives across the street from the proposed placement site. “Kind of blindsided everybody in the neighborhood.”

Deriemer says nobody lives at the home now and that the owner lives out of state.

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify or abbreviate their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

14 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Sounds to me like the neighbors in El Cajon deserve some payback.

Angered and unreasonable, just the kind of voters that helped to build this big angry and unreasonable green blob that lives in the 290 area code.

Betcha all these “concerned” people are just social media trolls angering themselves and each other. “Pffff, whattt?! A person is trying to live like a normal human being??!?! Next to me???”

(this same person doesn’t seem to mind the freeway is full of “potential murderers”)

For crying out loud, the man is 78 years old. What do they seriously expect him to do?

We must monitor the people who have been through the system; while being in the dark about the people who haven’t been caught. These people will crucify anyone or anything to make their fragile selfs feel good.

I happen to live here in El Cajon, That area is somewhat the border of el cajon and Mt Helix area (La Mesa)…. That area is nothing but stuck up snobs… Think their shit doesnt stink…. For the NEIGHBORS in this are to have know someone (SD SHERIFF PIGS) have had to gone door to door…. as this is a hilly area and sparsely populated.

Some one friggen 78 years old is of NO harm…. Not sure why he would be placed here as even this is a little bit of a ways off from public transp. O wait.. I know why he was placed here.. LAME GOVERNMENT ! Ill bet Parole is footing the bill for the house which will NOT be cheap (Probably upwards of 2K a month or more)….

Every time i hear stories about sex offenders moving into peoples neighborhoods and causing a big Community uproar i just laugh that’s what the community gets and SD county sheriffs office can deal with this problem i know they say to them selfies daam IML isn’t making are job any easier as it was supposed to where the hell can we put this 78 year old man without people knowing he’s there

Good luck✌😬

where’s the meeting location

https://www.ktvu.com/news/convicted-sex-offender-to-be-released-into-quiet-redwood-city-neighborhood

Redwood City did get this man blocked, 40 years in a correctional institution and they felt he wasn’t corrected. Shows they have no faith in the justice system’s ability to correct people.

Hell animals are treated better than someone with a sex offense no matter how long ago. Are people still wearing their chicken little costume all year round? The sky isn’t falling; yet your projected fear makes you look like a dumb cluck.

It’s embarrassing that registrants continue to get this undue focus while, all around America, non-registered men recently released from prison or simply out on bond for various violent (and non-sexual) offenses have been contributing to a near record level of violence in this country, notably against Asian-Americans. Just two days ago an Asian woman was stabbed to death in this very same state (California) by a man out on bond for another violent assault:

Asian woman stabbed to death in attack in California (nypost.com)

Even the New York Times has had to address the issue, it’s gotten so bad in NYC:

The New York Times on Twitter: “Many of the people charged recently with anti-Asian attacks in New York City have also had a history of mental health episodes, arrests and homelessness. The overlapping issues are complicating the city’s search for an effective response. https://t.co/PpBuf7y4GX” / Twitter

I don’t particularly want to throw other felons under the bus, but I also want to do the best for registrants and our families, and I don’t think we can break the illusion of the “particularly dangerous sex offender” until we set the public straight on the true recidivism statistics of other criminals and put pressure on the police to either start monitoring ALL SERIOUS FELONS–which would require an actual sensible strategy–or force them to admit that maybe the whole enterprise is unconstitutional and immoral.

Wait, so it says, “sexually assaulting male hitchhikers.” Minors or adults? Why wouldn’t a news article clarify this? If the victims were adults, why the hell would parents be concerned? (they shouldn’t even be concerned if it was minors..he’s 78 years old!) Especially when his crimes were so long ago. Oh wait, I forgot. Doesn’t matter how long ago a sexually-based offense occurred because the label never goes away.