Hawley’s cynical attack on nominee may be misguided

Source: ocregister.com 3/28/22

In a 1996 Harvard Law Review article, Ketanji Brown Jackson, then a law school student, noted the “climate of fear, hatred, and revenge” in which policies dealing with sex offenders are formulated. Before Jackson’s Supreme Court confirmation hearing began this week, Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Missouri, objected to that observation, then proceeded to demonstrate its accuracy.

Hawley’s misrepresentation of Jackson’s record in this area was typical of the criticism leveled at Supreme Court nominees, which often involves inflammatory, acontextual citations of a candidate’s statements and decisions. But it also illustrated the difficulty of having a rational conversation about the legal treatment of sex offenders, a broad and diverse category that extends far beyond the “child predators” on whom Hawley focused.

The senator claimed Jackson, as a federal judge, had shown an “alarming pattern” of “sentencing leniency for sex criminals” who are “preying on children.” But the cases he cited actually involved defendants convicted of possessing or sharing child pornography rather than defendants convicted of sexually abusing children.

Hawley averred that Jackson favored “letting child porn offenders off the hook for their appalling crimes.” Here, too, he obscured an important distinction: between people who produce child pornography, which necessarily entails abuse of children, and people who look at the resulting images.

Hawley also equated sentencing offenders of the latter type to, say, five years in prison rather than 15 with “letting (them) off the hook.” And he ignored longstanding, widespread, bipartisan criticism of the penalties that federal sentencing guidelines recommend for nonproduction child pornography offenses, which many judges, prosecutors and jurors view as excessive.

Federal law draws an outmoded distinction between receiving child pornography, which triggers a five-year mandatory minimum sentence, and possessing such material, which in the internet context is essentially the same crime. In possession cases, judges have more discretion, although the guidelines recommend penalties based on congressionally prescribed “enhancements” that cover nearly all defendants.

Read the full article


Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I’m surprised to see that article out of the OC register, that is typically a conservative newspaper. Fyi, article has a paywall.

Oh wow, the “conservative” newspaper sticking up for Registered Sex Offenders. My, my, my, how the times have changed. Got to thank Ms. Bellucci for fighting all those Orange County cities with residency restrictions. I have to believe that that had a great impact in making the OC Register have a contrarian opinion. Google “ocregister janice bellucci” to see how many articles she pops up in. Hopefully Ms. Bellucci practices until she’s 110 years old. Otherwise, who … is going to stand up for us? We’re literally all f*d if she retires.

Misguided,Cynical Attacks that’s a new one or is it an old one. Are we all misguided one way or another or does everybody want to be the BIG SHOT as Billy Joel sang or how pompus are others today. I’m not talking about the general public or just those know it all types. Talk about cynical attacks in the cortroom. I’m sure Janice and even many get them all the time. Guess one is either a cynic or critic. Guess that takes Love thy neighbor and throws it to the wind

Even with the misguided that can be a two way street such as these internet sting operations or a background check. Common sense si people will dupe on another for some type of gain. Sure in a court of law they strive to geet to the truth but what is truth… probable cause, reasonable doubt, or the I’m better than you additude. Seems we have to many thinkers either for good, bad, or evil or is it all about self. Sure people can talk about prison but have they actually been their, nobody know’s another human mind except the creator.

Sen. Josh Hawley Washes His Hands Of The ‘Pro-Pedophile’ Smears He Ignited
Ignoramus…now that the TV cameras and media have gone away for the most part, he calms down, speaks a bit more reasonable, but not completely, and decides to be more decent as a Sen for the moment.

Today, KJB was just confirmed by the Senate as the next Justice on SCOTUS. Apparently, she will join the court at the beginning of the next session, starting in June or July.