Bahamas may change legislation after sex offender dies days after being released from prison

NASSAU, Bahamas, Jun 1, CMC – The Bahamas government says it is likely to re-examine the measures under which sex offenders are publicly released from prison after one man died in hospital a few days after his release.

The authorities said that Alden Scott was found unresponsive on a dirt road while bleeding through the nose, but it is not known if he was attacked or the origin of his injuries.

Scott was released last Friday after being added to the sex offender registry. He served nine years in prison for sexual assault and was sentenced to two years in prison for caressing a girl’s thigh in January.

National Security Minister Wayne Munroe told reporters that an investigation has been launched into Scott’s death and warned that the public should refrain from issuing vigilante justice.

He hinted at the possibility of the authorities discontinuing public notification if it is found that Scott had been physically assaulted upon his release.

“If we find that it happened in circumstances that it was abundantly clear that you have vigilantes who will hunt and kill persons of which there is public notification…we will have to see what other steps can be taken,” Munroe said.

He said that the government may have to change the approach to public notification if the findings of the investigation show a particular outcome.

“For my preference, for people who are considered dangerous is to know where they are 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 52 weeks a year and for them to know that we know where they are.”

“And so, we will have to be looking now that this has happened into other steps we may take to protect the public and we are looking seriously at the laws they have in Canada about monitoring after release from sentences,” he added.


Alden was the first person to be added to the sex offenders’ registry in a public notice. Minister of National Security Wayne Munroe warned that the public should refrain from issuing vigilante justice and cautioned that public notification will be discontinued if anyone physically assaults Alden on his release.


Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Perhaps the leadership of the Island has realized they have blood on their hands. Ours knows it, but hey the needs of the many outweighs the needs of the few or the one. I simply refer to them as surveillance saints. I always find interesting the ways these entities are named, called, or otherwise referred to by DOJ law enforcement.

FBI blocked cyber attack on MA children’s Hosp. (AP:,E. Tucker and A. Suderman)
This AP scoop is very carefully worded and only hints slightly to the use of private entities in partnership with DOJ. Now compare the AP scoop to the piece that ran on ABC network.
Here the recognition is more clear whereas another potential word of the year candidate comes to light.” Hactivist” At least the entities were clearly referred to.

While I applaud their government for recognizing a problem with the public notification, I don’t hold out much hope for them changing it.

When a government publicily classifies one group of people as “dangerous” and “deviant” vigilante attacks, as well as denial of housing, work, and basic services, is inevitable. Human-beings have the potential for malevolence or benevolence, and will embrance either extreme with majority approval. On the surface, policy-makers admonish assault and discriminatory treatment of registrants, but in practice they truely do not care – whatsover – about anything that happens to those on the “Hit List”. We all know this, and by now the general population knows this…but so few actually care, or have the resources and influence to push for significant change. This could change in the future…but today, everything is just “buisness as usual”.

From the article:

“For my preference, for people who are considered dangerous is to know where they are 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 52 weeks a year and for them to know that we know where they are.”

“Considered dangerous” is stripping rights already paid for after conviction by the courts, but that thought process cost this man his life still doesn’t deter this line of thinking?

This is all thanks to 2003 Smith v Doe, that all the recidivism rates are “frightening and high”.

So the pop quiz is ” who’s considered dangerous” answer anybody thats cornered by another in a situation which can be considered dangerous.. I believe its called the nature of the beast.. Talk about a woman’s scorn or the mouth overloading one’s…..@##xx88?!!! Do politicans’ do it all the time. They will promise you the moon but when elected it all changes in many ways. Even courtroom atmosphere’s can change for or against.

I don’t know anything about the Bahamas but from views of others the USA seems to be a dead wait when true justice needs to be reproved or amended in many ways. One has to be very experienced to be up for this type of changing how sex offenders are viewed, incarcerated and/ or punished. Even this having one’s conviction in the newspaper is a bit shaky on a personal note but who is to weight what goes into a newspaper. A divorce settlement or a parole settlement or were’s the advantage.