CA: San Diego County Board of Supervisors Call Emergency Meeting Urging Nathan Fletcher’s Immediate Resignation

UPDATE: San Diego County Supervisors Call on Nathan Fletcher to Resign Immediately 4/12/23

 

Source: nbcsandiego.com 4/9/23

The San Diego County Board of Supervisors will hold an emergency meeting on Tuesday morning calling for Nathan Fletcher’s immediate resignation from office and pass a resolution of no confidence him, according to a release from Supervisor Jim Desmond’s office Sunday night.

Desmond’s office reminded constituents that while the board does not have the ultimate power to remove Fletcher, the resolution would serve as a powerful statement for him to resign.

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

7 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This d-bag needs to buck up and do the right thing and resign immediately.
This dude is almost 50, he’s married, and he’s screwing around with a 19-year-old co-worker (this much is unrefuted). Never mind whether it was consensual or not – for the rest of us, we would have been fired on the spot!!!

Can we just use this in future handouts to speak out against the registry?

Fact: Less than 5% of parolees are re-arrested for a new sex crime.

Fact: The registry does not improve public safety; it hinders it.

Fact: The person who pushed for harder requirements to get off the registry was complicit in sexual harassment.

To be perfectly frank, I believe the very same actions could be taken against a much larger fish. He being the top dog on the top court. I made the motion on SOSEN.org some yrs. ago. It’s not like this guy has a life time appointment. To me this is a common hostile work environment issue, not that different from the work environment issue everywhere. Men making advances at work? Who’d a thought? I’m not making his actions OK, but it’s not more than nuisance behavior, harassment. I’d rather be her than the people in the Louisville bank! If we circumvent one, will the effect the other? No doubt both of the villains San Diego and Louisville were well polished, professional and pretty men. Each worked in supervisory roles. Administrators!
Where’s the database registry of convicted criminal Administrators?

The proposed action (called for by Supervisor Jim Desmond and a number of his colleagues, as well as a number of other San Diego elected polticians), is nothing more than political grandstanding, and reflects these politicians’ knee-jerk reaction to cover their own butts.

Wondering how many of these finger-in-the-wind politicians have similar or worse skeletons in their own closets? Any guesses?