CA: San Diego MTS board launches independent probe into Fletcher sexual misconduct allegations

Source: 4/6/23

Elected leaders overseeing MTS call for public transparency with the inquiry into allegations that a former employee was sexually harassed by Nathan Fletcher and wrongfully fired.

San Diego — Elected officials overseeing the San Diego Metropolitan Transit System announced Thursday they’re launching an independent investigation into legal allegations by a former employee that she was sexually assaulted by county Supervisor Nathan Fletcher and then improperly fired by the agency.

The oversight panel also directed MTS staff not to provide any legal defense for Fletcher, who recently stepped down as the agency’s board chair.

The move comes as MTS staff prepare their legal defense against the lawsuit, which was filed in late March by former public relations officer Grecia Figueroa. The plaintiff is seeking compensation for lost wages, attorney fees and emotional distress.

Board members overseeing the agency said they voted in a closed-session hearing on Thursday to pursue their own probe in the spirit of transparency. The legal case may reach a confidential settlement agreement before it goes to trial.

“It’s the board’s intent that the findings of the investigation will be made public,” San Diego City Councilmember Stephen Whitburn, who replaced Fletcher as the acting MTS board chair, told reporters after the private meeting.

Read the full article


Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  19. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Every article I read about the demise of this dipstick puts a smile on my face.

Looks like Fletcher is under investigation for millions of dollars of security for including time going and meeting his mistress. The investigation continues

Elected officials are launching an ” independent ” probe…
Independent of what? Politics? Me thinks not. How often do we mistakenly interchange ” bipartisan” and ” independent?”
From the end of the first paragraph; which one was wrongly terminated? Her or him? Given the man has resigned I’d say someone is capitalizing on the situation to score points.

I think medically, they cannot terminate him due to his ongoing treatment. If they did, then that would bring on their own issues of wrongful termination, I believe.