WI: The Child Victims Act aims to support survivors of childhood sexual abuse

Source: weau.com 5/8/23

EAU CLAIRE, Wis. (WEAU) – Wisconsin legislators have proposed a new bill that would help survivors of childhood sexual abuse.

The Child Victims Act extends the amount of time that victims of child sexual abuse can file private lawsuits against their abusers. The new length of time for survivors would be up to 45 years old, the same amount of time that they’re able to file criminal charges.

Sexual assault advocate at Family Resource Center in Eau Claire, Amanda S., said sexual assault is considered one of the most underreported crimes.

State Senator Jesse James of Altoona, co-author of the Child Victims Act, said the bill is working to change that and give survivors of child sexual abuse a change to pursue legal action against their abusers well into adulthood.

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

14 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Okay, show of hands, who’s in favor of abolishing all statutes of limitation?? Anyone?? 🤷🏻‍♂️

(Hmmm, what if I was abused in a past life? 🤔)

Mitchell v. Roberts, 2020 UT 34, found Utahs attempt to revive these claims when the previous SOL had run as a violation of separation of powers and due process.

So what if it’s years later now, sue them in civil court!
You can be “E. William Carroll”!

(Especially if your attorney calls expert witnesses who state that your own offenses were the result of the abuse you yourself suffered as a young child.) 🤔🤷🏻‍♂️

These type of laws are starting to happen around the country. It’s not surprising that Wisconsin now wants a bite at the apple. While reading this story, I stumpled across an even more important story on this newsite. A Wisconsin man was arrested and charged with possession of cp after being caught on a work resources public computer for viewing a modeling site with young children in skimpy underwear. This is how far these cp laws have gone. It doesn’t even have to involve sex anymore. Just a ‘sexually procative’ pose. So this man will likely serve at least 3 years in prison under Wisconsin’s mandatory minimum law unless he gets a good lawyer to have these bogus charges thrown out

William, I had an exploratory baby sitter when I was about five or so and she was twelve or thirteen. Certainly, I didn’t experience it as abusive because none of it was forced or coerced and I only vaguely recall it, today. Trauma is highly correlated with the use of force. The data on that is clear.