CA Supreme Court ruling will change how police interact with public when stopping, questioning

Source: abc7news.com 5/3/24

SAN FRANCISCO (KGO) — A new ruling by the California Supreme Court may change how police interact with the public.

Community groups say it’s an important step to prevent over-policing.

But some police unions say it’s going to make it harder for police to work effectively.

“I think it’s a very important decision,” says Sujung Kim, a managing attorney at the San Francisco Public Defender’s Office.

She says with this ruling, the Supreme Court of California is finally recognizing instances of over-policing — especially in communities of color.

“For, you know, innocent behavior. For just being in a certain neighborhood and characterized as criminal. The court has finally acknowledged that fact,” Kim said.

On Thursday, the court ruled to restrict the grounds under which police can stop and hold people for questioning. It stems from the case The People vs. Marlon Flores.

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

good because 90-95% of these DEGENERATES are corrupt in the 1st place. and here is more BS ” California’s politicians and courts are making it harder and harder for police officers to do their job to protect the communities we serve. ” It isnt DEGENERATES jobs to be NOSEY… Same reason they HARASS RSO’s in CA that arent on prob/parole and they come out to see if we live where we say we do, they have NO RIGHT and nothing in the 290 CODE allows them to HOUSE CHECK us. Its called CORRUPTION and a WAY to get $$ from the state/city to RUN thier CORRUPT orginasation.

Same goes with WHY the law changed they cant pull you over in CA and ask “DO YOU KNOW WHY I PULLED YOU OVER”.. If you accidently say speeding that equals ticket equals more money to feed thier CORRUPTION machine.

I went to a retired police officers funeral and at the service one his fellow officers told the story of how he, the deceased, decided who he should approach on the street. He would see a person and ask himself, would I want that person to walk by my wife on the sidewalk? Everyone laughed except me. Disgusted. Trust me, that would definitely be a benchmark for this guy. Got to have the right look or else.