Court Grants ACSOL Motion to Intervene in CA SVP Case

Source: ACSOL

A judge in California Placer County Superior Court has granted a motion filed by the Alliance for Constitutional Sex Offense Laws (ACSOL) to intervene in the case of William Stephenson who has been designated a sexually violent predator (SVP).  Intervention allows ACSOL to assist Mr. Stephenson in his quest to be placed in a residence in Placer County, his county of domicile, or another location.

Due in large part to opposition from the District Attorney of Placer County, Mr. Stephenson has already waited for more than 850 days to be placed in a private residence after he was admitted by the CA Department of State Hospitals into the conditional release program.  During that time, several locations have been identified as potential residences, however, each time the owner of the residence declined to rent a residence in which Mr. Stephenson could reside.

“The Department of State Hospitals only allows individuals to enter the conditional release program after they have met many stringent requirements and a determination made by experts that the individual can be safely released into the community,” stated ACSOL Executive Director Janice Bellucci.  “In the history of the conditional release program, less than 60 people have qualified for that program and no one admitted into that program has every committed a subsequent sex offense.”

The Court will conduct its next hearing on July 8 during which motions for Mr. Stephenson’s release as a transient will be considered.  The public defender representing Mr. Stephenson filed the original motion for transient release and the district attorney has opposed that motion.  ACSOL will now be allowed to file an additional motion because of its status as an intervenor in the case.

During the hearing, the Court asked for information from the Department of State Hospitals regarding whether housing outside Placer County, including Sacramento County, might be available for Mr. Stephenson.  The Court also asked for information regarding whether Mr. Stephenson could be housed with another individual designated as an SVP in Placer County.  That information is expected to be shared with the Court during the July 8 hearing.

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Thank you for doing this work, challenging unconstitutional safety theater.

I’m glad ACSOL is taking up the SVP issue. As long as SVPs are demonized and never released and never let off the registry, the registry will remain forever.

Good ol’ Placer County, whose sheriff spent God-knows how much time and money (county and federal) searching for Kiely Rodni by initiating a registry scrub of all Placer and surrounding counties when they presumed she was kidnapped by a registrant because they couldn’t find her car. Straight out of the pages of Law and Order: SVU. (Rodni was found by a group of volunteer scuba divers within hours of their arrival after searching the closest lake to her last known location which had supposedly been searched already. No evidence of assault of any kind was found.)

If the competence of the Placer County DA is comparable to the sheriff’s department, Janice should have very little (if any) trouble with this case.

These individuals – so called SVPs – need all the support we can provide. Thank you Janice!