US appeals court rejects sentencing panel’s compassionate release policy

Source: reuters.com 11/1/24

Nov 1 (Reuters) – A federal appeals court on Friday ruled that the U.S. Sentencing Commission lacked authority to enact a policy last year that would allow judges to deem changes in law as “extraordinary and compelling” reasons justifying releasing prisoners early.
A three-judge panel of the Philadelphia-based 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reached that conclusion as it rejected, opens new tab a Pennsylvania man’s bid to reduce the nearly 42-1/2 year prison sentence he received for committing two armed robberies in 2003.
 
The defendant, Daniel Rutherford, had argued that following the passage of the criminal justice reform law the First Step Act, he was eligible for compassionate release because if he were sentenced for his crimes today, his sentence would be at least 18 years shorter than what he received in 2006.
The decision was decried by U.S. Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois, the chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, who with fellow Democratic Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey had filed a friend-of-the court brief, opens new tab arguing the Sentencing Commission validly exercised its authority.
 
Durbin, who had backed the First Step Act, in a statement said the ruling wrongly stripped trial judges of their ability to determine if a change in law justified compassionate release and undermined the Sentencing Commission’s authority.
“This question will ultimately be resolved by the Supreme Court, and I’m hopeful that the court will uphold the Sentencing Commission’s authority and respect the ability of judges to exercise their discretion on a case-by-case basis,” Durbin said.
 
The Sentencing Commission had no comment. A lawyer for Rutherford did not respond to a request for comment.

Read the full article

 

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments