U.S. Sentencing Commission Seeks Comment on Proposals to Promote Public Safety and Simplify Federal Sentencing

R H

Source: U.S. Sentencing Commission 12/19/24

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today the bipartisan United States Sentencing Commission voted unanimously to publish proposed amendments to the federal sentencing guidelines for the amendment cycle ending May 1, 2025. These proposals stem from public input the Commission has received in recent years, including more than 1,200 pages of comments on what work the agency should prioritize this amendment cycle. Among today’s proposals are those that would: 

  • create an alternative to the “categorical approach” used in the career offender guideline to determine whether a conviction qualifies a defendant for enhanced penalties; 
  • simplify the “three-step” approach that courts currently use when applying the guidelines; 
  • address the guidelines’ treatment of devices designed to convert firearms into fully automatic weapons;
  • add a mens rea requirement to the sentencing enhancement for use of stolen firearms; and 
    resolve certain circuit conflicts regarding guideline application.

“We look forward to hearing from the public about these proposals in light of the Commission’s statutory obligation to promote fairness in sentencing, end unwarranted disparities, and ensure sentences reflect the latest data, research, and science,” said Judge Carlton W. Reeves, Chair of the Commission. “Over the next month, the Commission will consider whether to publish additional proposals that reflect the public comment, stakeholder input, and feedback from judges that we have received over the last year – including at the roundtables we have held in recent months on drug sentencing and supervised release.”

The Commission is seeking comment on these proposals through February 3, 2025 with a reply period closing on February 18, 2025. The public is encouraged to submit comment through the agency’s comment portal available here. A public hearing will be scheduled on these proposals in early 2025. Official text of proposed amendments and issues for comment will also be published in a forthcoming edition of the Federal Register. “We welcome your comments,” said Chair Reeves.

The Commission includes U.S. District Judge Carlton W. Reeves (Chair), U.S. Circuit Judge Luis Felipe Restrepo (Vice Chair), Laura E. Mate (Vice Chair), Claire Murray (Vice Chair), Candice C. Wong (Commissioner), John Gleeson (Commissioner) and Judge Claria Horn Boom (Commissioner), with Scott A.C. Meisler (ex officio, U.S. Department of Justice) and Patricia K. Cushwa (ex officio, U.S. Parole Commission) serving as non-voting members.

Read the full article and optionally watch the meeting and submit a comment

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

1 Comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Wasn’t it the sentencing commission that recommended that CP and other [Sex Crimes] be given a lower sentence and that all CP should be classified as Tier 1, not Tier 3? What good is this group since the courts never listen to them unless they recommend doing what the court already planned to do?

1
Reply