MD: Lawmakers consider proposal to reduce potential of billions in sex abuse payouts

Source: marylandmatters.org 3/25/25

Supporters and opponents brace for courtroom fight if bill passes

 

Facing the potential of multibillion-dollar payouts, lawmakers will consider legislation this week that would limit the state’s liability under the 2023 Child Victims Act.

But advocates, legal experts and, not unexpectedly, attorneys for one group of nearly 5,000 plaintiffs who claim to have been sexually abused at the hands of state workers, say the proposed fix goes too far, and is likely unconstitutional.

Even Del. C.T. Wilson (D-Charles), the author of both the original bill and the new proposal to rein in the state’s liability, said Monday night that the proposed fix will likely be heavily rewritten. But something needs to be done, he said.

When it passed, the Child Victims Act was heralded as a way for survivors of institutional sexual abuse to seek justice. But it inadvertently threw open the doors to potentially budget-crushing payouts that would be difficult for the state to absorb in a year when it is flush with cash.

This is not one of those years.

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I think back when this was passed into law, we, those in the forum, questioned the finances related to it since they did not put a cap in place. They merely put the ability to seek redress in place. Now, the state is facing what they should have anticipated then. Again, legislatures not thinking things through the first time. They will push this through and get it signed into law only to be legally challenged before the ink has time to dry.

The taxpayers won’t stand for keeping the state self-insured like this where a cap is logical or put into place their own version of a Feres Doctrine where the citizens cannot take on the state for any wrongdoing much like service members cannot take on the US military when there is wrongdoing.

It’s days like this that I genuinely thank the Germans for coming up with a word as perfect as schadenfreude.

“When you go through this, you always think you’re alone,” said Wilson, who has publicly discussed a childhood that included physical and sexual abuse. “Never in my wildest dreams did I think there were this many people — enough to bankrupt the state.”

I’m not proud of it but I’m literally laughing so much right now. The leviathan is finally eating itself.

I guess the buck stops with us. The state can point the finger, just not at themselves.