Trick-or-Treating Laws: Age Limits, Curfews, and Other Restrictions You Need to Know

Source: nolo.com 10/24/25

Discover how some states and cities pass legislation—ranging from quirky to serious—designed to ensure a safe Halloween for all.
By Ann O’Connell, Attorney  UC Berkeley School of Law
Updated 10/24/2025
 
Halloween—the one night a year when it’s socially acceptable to dress as a monster and demand candy from strangers. But before you grab your plastic pumpkin and hit the streets, you might want to check your local laws. Across America, dozens of cities and towns have ordinances that could turn innocent trick-or-treating into a criminal offense. From age restrictions that would make a teenager a lawbreaker to curfews stricter than your parents ever imposed, Halloween is surprisingly regulated in some areas.

And then there are the serious laws—state- and local-level restrictions designed to keep children safe by prohibiting convicted sex offenders from participating in Halloween activities. These laws serve a critical public safety function, even if they don’t get as much attention as the quirky municipal codes.

Here’s a glimpse into the fascinating (and sometimes bewildering) world of Halloween law…

 

The Serious Side—Registered Sex Offender Restrictions on Halloween

Now we turn from the quirky to the critical. Numerous states have enacted laws specifically restricting registered sex offenders—particularly those on parole or probation—from participating in Halloween activities. These laws serve a legitimate public safety purpose: keeping children safe during a holiday when they’re going door-to-door in the dark.

California’s “Operation Boo”

California has the longest-running and most comprehensive Halloween sex offender program in the nation. “Operation Boo” is administered by the California Department of Corrections (CDCR) and Rehabilitation’s Division of Adult Parole Operations (DAPO).

According to a CDCR press release, on October 31, 2024, 306 parole agents, along with local law enforcement partners, conducted compliance checks on sex offenders under supervision. The results showed that 96% of the supervised persons were in compliance.

Under California’s Operation Boo, sex offender parolees who are prohibited from contact with minors must comply with strict conditions on Halloween night, including:

mandatory curfew from 5:00 p.m. on October 31 to 5:00 a.m. on November 1
must remain indoors during curfew hours
all exterior home lights must be turned off to discourage children from approaching
can’t offer Halloween candy
can’t display Halloween decorations, and
may only open the door to law enforcement conducting compliance checks.
Violations can result in parole revocation and criminal charges. It is unclear whether Operation Boo will continue this year.

Other States’ Halloween Sex Offender Laws

Many other states have laws that limit the actions of convicted sex offenders on Halloween. These laws often require sex offenders to stay home with their lights off, prohibit them from passing out candy, and ban them from wearing costumes on Halloween. For example, the Tennessee Department of Correction’s (TDOC) “Operation Black Out” has historically prohibited offenders from participating in Halloween parties or attractions such as corn mazes, and TDOC officers have performed hundreds of compliance checks on Halloween. Similarly, New York’s “Halloween: Zero Tolerance” program has made unannounced home visits and calls to enforce Halloween-related restrictions.

Even if there’s no statewide law, there might be a …

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

If you are feeling extremely depressed and possibly even suicidal, please call or text 988 (suicide hotline) or any loved one who you believe is immediately available. If you feel depressed and in need of a friendly community and unbiased emotional support, you can email Alex and Marty at emotionalsupportgroup@all4consolaws.org

 

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify or abbreviate their name. 
  24. Please check for typos, spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors before submitting.  Comments that have many errors will not be approved. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

16 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

All these restrictions on PFR when NO child has been hurt on Halloween by a PFR since 1976. Kids are more in danger getting hit by a car!

In over 250 Halloweens, there has NEVER been a sexual assault or attempt against a trick-or-treater by a person with priors (Note: Lisa French’s assailant had no priors at the time). Yet, they are killed and injured by drunk drivers and caught in drive-by shooting crossfire every year and LE does ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to try to prevent it.

I honestly don’t know if I should laugh or cry about that.

Does Operation Boo in CA extend to people off paper? Are PFRs off paper harassed on Halloween in CA?

“These laws serve a legitimate public safety purpose: keeping children safe during a holiday when they’re going door-to-door in the dark:”

Actually, that’s a debunked and fradulent assertion.

Even if it WERE true, there is no evidentariy data to support that nebulous statement.

Modern Halloween functions have segued into the “Trunk R Treat” model anyway.

At the bottom of the article, you press the thumbs down button and share feedback with facts about what is actually a danger to children on Halloween.

I sent this as feedback. No idea if they have the intellectual integrity to make changes to the article or not.

You are providing false information about Sex registry laws. Contrary to popular belief, these law do not serve a legitimate public safety purpose. There are exactly zero reported incidences when a registered individual committed a sexual assault on a trick-or-treater coming to their home. Yes, that’s correct, in the entire history of Halloween no child has been assaulted by trick-or-treating at the home of a person on the registry. Meanwhile, a large number of children are killed and injured from gun violence and vehicles on Halloween.

I would ask that, for the sake of journalistic integrity and to help keep kids safe on Halloween, that you update your article to reinforce the very correct and valid information that children are not at risk trick-or-treating at homes of people on the registry, many of whom have children themselves.

Also, as a side note, it simply does not make sense. Not only is recidivism very low for people on the registry (nearly all sexual assaults are committed by first timers not on the register) but the idea that someone would abduct a person from their own porch is absurd. It’s the same reason laws restricting where registered citizens can live don’t work. People who want to hurt kids drive somewhere else to do it. They don’t walk outside of their house and grab a random passer-by.

Thanks for reading this and I hope it inspires you to dig a little deeper and put out some information that will help keep kids safe and not distract parents, like myself, from actual dangers for fear of dangers which simply do not exist.